ArticleBMJ open2023
Developing a magnetic POCUS-guided bronchoscope for patients with suspected difficult endotracheal intubation in a general tertiary hospital: protocol for a randomised controlled study.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05647174 (Developing a Magnetic-POCUS-assisted Bronchoscopy in Difficult Endotracheal Intubation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Developing a Magnetic-POCUS-assisted Bronchoscopy in Difficult Endotracheal Intubation
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEndotracheal intubation (ETI) is a crucial but risky procedure, especially among patients suspected of difficult endotracheal intubation (DTI). Bronchoscope, as an improved technique commonly used in DTI, might encounter visualisation difficulties. The magnetic point-of-care ultrasound (MGPOCUS) provides a novel visualisation from the outside and enables estimation of the relative position and trajectory of the bronchoscope. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of MGPOCUS-guided bronchoscopy, including the time required for successful ETI, the first attempt and overall success rate, the number of attempts, complications, and satisfaction with the visualization of the procedures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is a randomised, parallel-group, single-blinded, single-centre study. Participants (n=108) will be recruited by the primary anaesthesiologist and randomised to groups of ETI with bronchoscope or MGPOCUS-guided bronchoscope. The primary outcome is the time taken to the first-attempt success ETI. Secondary outcomes include procedure time, the first-attempt and overall success, complications, and satisfaction of visualisation. Cox regression with Bonferroni correction and linear mixed regression will be used to analyse the outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial protocol was approved by the ethics committees at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital (Institutional Review Board #ZS-3428). Findings will be disseminated through conference presentations and peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05647174.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.