Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37369370›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2024

Real-life Assessment of BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel in Adults Hospitalized With Respiratory Illness.

Ann R Falsey, Angela R Branche, Daniel P Croft, Maria A Formica, Michael R Peasley, Edward E Walsh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microbiome Profiling Reveals Prognostic Heterogeneity inmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Optimal antibiotic use in the intensive care unit.Critical care (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Open forum infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Diagnosing and Treating Community-Acquired Pneumonia-A Double-Blind Study?Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ann R FalseyInfectious Diseases, Department of Medicine.
Angela R BrancheInfectious Diseases, Department of Medicine.
Daniel P CroftDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Medicine, University of Rochester.
Maria A FormicaInfectious Disease Unit, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA.
Michael R PeasleyInfectious Diseases, Department of Medicine.
Edward E WalshInfectious Diseases, Department of Medicine.
University of Rochester · USRochester General Hospital · US

Funding

VISUAL INDICES OF NEUROTOXICITYP30ES001247 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Martha Susiarjo · 1985 to 2026
$42.8M
Transcriptional Profiling to Discriminate Bacterial and Non-bacterial Respiratory IllnessesR01AI137364 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI FALSEY, ANN R, MARIANI, THOMAS J · 2019 to 2023
$3.8M
Effect of Air Pollution on the Immune Response to Respiratory Viral Infection in AdultsK23ES032459 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CROFT, DANIEL PATRICK · 2021 to 2025
$1.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI137364NIEHS NIH HHS K23 ES032459NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES001247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInability to identify the microbial etiology of lower respiratory tract infection leads to unnecessary antibiotic use. We evaluated the utility of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (BioFire PN) to inform microbiologic diagnosis.

methodsHospitalized adults with respiratory illness were recruited; sputa and clinical/laboratory data were collected. Sputa were cultured for bacteria and tested with BioFire PN. Microbial etiology was adjudicated by 4 physicians. Bacterial polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was compared with culture and clinical adjudication.

resultsOf 298 sputa tested, BioFire PN detected significantly more pathogens (350 bacteria, 16 atypicals, and 164 viruses) than sputum culture plus any standard-of-care testing (91% vs 60%, P < .0001). When compared with culture, the sensitivity of BioFire PN for individual bacteria was 46% to 100%; specificity, 61% to 100%; and negative predictive value, 92% to 100%. Cases were adjudicated as viral (n = 58) and bacterial (n = 100). PCR detected bacteria in 55% of viral cases and 95% of bacterial (P < .0001). High serum procalcitonin and bacterial adjudication were more often associated with sputa with 106 or 107 copies detected.

conclusionsMultiplex PCR testing of sputa for bacteria is useful to rule out bacterial infection with added value to detect viruses and atypical bacteria.

Indexed as

PneumoniaRespiratory Tract InfectionsVirusesAdultBacteriaHumansMultiplex Polymerase Chain Reactionbacteriadiagnosticrespiratory illnesssputumviruses

Identifiers

PMID37369370
PMCPMC10786250
OpenAlexW4382199104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.