Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37369234›Full record

ArticleThrombosis and haemostasis2024

The Impact of Polypharmacy on the Effectiveness and Safety of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Maxim Grymonprez, Mirko Petrovic, Tine L De Backer, Stephane Steurbaut, Lies Lahousse

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thrombosis and haemostasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maxim GrymonprezDepartment of Bioanalysis, Pharmaceutical Care Unit, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0145-6486
Mirko PetrovicDepartment of Geriatrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Tine L De BackerDepartment of Cardiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Stephane SteurbautCentre for Pharmaceutical Research, Research group of Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium.
Lies LahousseDepartment of Bioanalysis, Pharmaceutical Care Unit, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BEErasmus MC · NLGhent University · BEVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) 11C0820N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolypharmacy may affect outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) using non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) due to interactions or reduced adherence, but comparative data are lacking. Therefore, the impact of polypharmacy on AF-related outcomes and benefit-risk profiles of NOACs in patients with polypharmacy were investigated.

methodsAF patients initiating anticoagulation between 2013 and 2019 were included using Belgian nationwide data. Inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox regression was used to investigate outcomes.

resultsAmong 254,478 AF patients, 167,847 (66.0%) used ≥5 drugs. Polypharmacy was associated with higher stroke or systemic embolism (stroke/SE) (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.15), all-cause mortality (aHR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.40-1.50), and major bleeding risks (aHR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.23-1.35). Among patients with polypharmacy, NOACs were associated with lower stroke/SE (aHR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0.73), all-cause mortality (aHR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.77-0.84), major bleeding (aHR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87-0.97), and intracranial bleeding risks (aHR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.69-0.85), but higher gastrointestinal bleeding risks (aHR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01-1.19) compared to VKAs. Major bleeding risks were lower with apixaban (aHR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.74-0.85), but nonsignificantly different with other NOACs compared to VKAs. Lower major bleeding risks were observed with dabigatran (aHR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.97) and apixaban (aHR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.73-0.81) compared to rivaroxaban, and with apixaban compared to dabigatran (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77-0.90) and edoxaban (HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.70-0.85).

conclusionPolypharmacy was associated with increased thromboembolic, bleeding, and mortality risks in AF patients. NOACs had better benefit-risk profiles than VKAs in patients with polypharmacy.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationStrokeAdministration, OralAnticoagulantsDabigatranGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansPolypharmacyRivaroxabanAnticoagulantsDabigatranRivaroxaban

Identifiers

PMID37369234
PMCPMC10824584
OpenAlexW4382196680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.