ReviewPerspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2024
Maintaining Transient Diversity Is a General Principle for Improving Collective Problem Solving.
Review in Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Condorcet and Beyond: An Empirical Comparison of Voting Rules.Cognitive science · 2026Article
- Analogies evolve by increasing transmission fidelity in the communication of complex information.Evolutionary human sciences · 2026Article
- The case against efficiency: friction in social media.Npj complexity · 2026Review
- User control of search algorithms would improve science.Nature human behaviour · 2025Article
- Network indicators of cultural resilience to anthropogenic removals in animal societies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Mutual benefits of social learning and algorithmic mediation for cumulative culture.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
- Copy or collaborate? How networks impact collective problem solving.Npj complexity · 2025Article
- Opening strategies in the game of go from feudalism to superhuman AI.Evolutionary human sciences · 2025Article
- How large language models can reshape collective intelligence.Nature human behaviour · 2024Review
- Noise and opinion dynamics: how ambiguity promotes pro-majority consensus in the presence of confirmation bias.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Mandevillian vices.Synthese · 2024Article
- Social identity bias and communication network clustering interact to shape patterns of opinion dynamics.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023Article
- Innovation-facilitating networks create inequality.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Minority-group incubators and majority-group reservoirs support the diffusion of climate change adaptations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans regularly solve complex problems in cooperative teams. A wide range of mechanisms have been identified that improve the quality of solutions achieved by those teams on reaching consensus. We argue that many of these mechanisms work via increasing the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.