Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37369035›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

Hierarchical graph transformer with contrastive learning for protein function prediction.

Zhonghui Gu, Xiao Luo, Jiaxiao Chen, Minghua Deng, Luhua Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. GOBeacon: An ensemble model for protein function prediction enhanced by contrastive learning.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhonghui GuPeking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6142-4358
Xiao LuoDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024, United States.
Jiaxiao ChenCenter for Quantitative Biology, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Minghua DengCenter for Quantitative Biology, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Luhua LaiPeking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8343-7587

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationIn recent years, high-throughput sequencing technologies have made large-scale protein sequences accessible. However, their functional annotations usually rely on low-throughput and pricey experimental studies. Computational prediction models offer a promising alternative to accelerate this process. Graph neural networks have shown significant progress in protein research, but capturing long-distance structural correlations and identifying key residues in protein graphs remains challenging.

resultsIn the present study, we propose a novel deep learning model named Hierarchical graph transformEr with contrAstive Learning (HEAL) for protein function prediction. The core feature of HEAL is its ability to capture structural semantics using a hierarchical graph Transformer, which introduces a range of super-nodes mimicking functional motifs to interact with nodes in the protein graph. These semantic-aware super-node embeddings are then aggregated with varying emphasis to produce a graph representation. To optimize the network, we utilized graph contrastive learning as a regularization technique to maximize the similarity between different views of the graph representation. Evaluation of the PDBch test set shows that HEAL-PDB, trained on fewer data, achieves comparable performance to the recent state-of-the-art methods, such as DeepFRI. Moreover, HEAL, with the added benefit of unresolved protein structures predicted by AlphaFold2, outperforms DeepFRI by a significant margin on Fmax, AUPR, and Smin metrics on PDBch test set. Additionally, when there are no experimentally resolved structures available for the proteins of interest, HEAL can still achieve better performance on AFch test set than DeepFRI and DeepGOPlus by taking advantage of AlphaFold2 predicted structures. Finally, HEAL is capable of finding functional sites through class activation mapping. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Implementations of our HEAL can be found at https://github.com/ZhonghuiGu/HEAL.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAmino Acid SequenceNeural Networks, ComputerSemantics

Identifiers

PMID37369035
PMCPMC10338137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.