Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37368874›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2023

A biologist's guide to planning and performing quantitative bioimaging experiments.

Rebecca A Senft, Barbara Diaz-Rohrer, Pina Colarusso, Lucy Swift, Nasim Jamali, Helena Jambor, Thomas Pengo, Craig Brideau, Paula Montero Llopis, Virginie Uhlmann and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Rebecca A SenftImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0081-4170
Barbara Diaz-RohrerImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Pina ColarussoLive Cell Imaging Laboratory, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Lucy SwiftLive Cell Imaging Laboratory, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Nasim JamaliImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Helena JamborNational Center for Tumor Diseases, University Cancer Center, NCT-UCC, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Thomas PengoInformatics Institute, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Craig BrideauLive Cell Imaging Laboratory, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Paula Montero LlopisMicRoN Core, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Virginie UhlmannEuropean Bioinformatic Institute, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, United Kingdom.
Jason KirkOptical Imaging & Vital Microscopy Core, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Kevin Andrew GonzalesMammalian Cell Biology and Development, Rockefeller University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Peter BankheadEdinburgh Pathology, Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, and CRUK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Edward L EvansMorgridge Institute and University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Kevin W EliceiriMorgridge Institute and University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Beth A CiminiImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9640-9318
Broad Institute · USUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USBaylor College of Medicine · USEdinburgh Cancer Research · GBEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GBHarvard University · USNational Center for Tumor Diseases · DERockefeller University · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Center for Open Bioimage AnalysisP41GM135019 · NIGMS · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI CARPENTER, ANNE E., CIMINI, BETH · 2020 to 2024
$6.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM135019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technological advancements in biology and microscopy have empowered a transition from bioimaging as an observational method to a quantitative one. However, as biologists are adopting quantitative bioimaging and these experiments become more complex, researchers need additional expertise to carry out this work in a rigorous and reproducible manner. This Essay provides a navigational guide for experimental biologists to aid understanding of quantitative bioimaging from sample preparation through to image acquisition, image analysis, and data interpretation. We discuss the interconnectedness of these steps, and for each, we provide general recommendations, key questions to consider, and links to high-quality open-access resources for further learning. This synthesis of information will empower biologists to plan and execute rigorous quantitative bioimaging experiments efficiently.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy

Identifiers

PMID37368874
PMCPMC10298797
OpenAlexW4382345223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.