Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37368772›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2023

Biofilm-Producing Ability of

Mária Vargová, František Zigo, Jana Výrostková, Zuzana Farkašová, Ibrahim F Rehan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Enterotoxin and biofilm producing Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA isolates from animal source foods sold in Assam.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Antimicrobial Resistance Profile and Biofilm Formation ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Comprehensive whole genome analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mária VargováDepartment of the Environment, Veterinary Legislation and Economy, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, 04181 Košice, Slovakia.
František ZigoDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Husbandry, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, 04181 Košice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-2791-166X
Jana VýrostkováDepartment of Food Hygiene, Technology, and Safety, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, 04181 Košice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-3117-8915
Zuzana FarkašováDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Husbandry, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, 04181 Košice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-1953-1840
Ibrahim F RehanDepartment of Husbandry and Development of Animal Wealth, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin Alkom 32511, Egypt.

Funding

VEGA 1-0162-23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the incidence of mastitis in 153 dairy cows and to evaluate the kinetics of adhesion of isolates obtained from surfaces and milk in comparison with the reference strain (RS), CCM 4223. The surfaces of the floor, teat cup, and cow restraints were aseptically swabbed in three replicates (n = 27). Of the total number of infected cows (n = 43), 11 samples were found to be positive for

Indexed as

biofilmenvironmentmastitismilkingparlorStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID37368772
PMCPMC10303978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.