Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37368615›Full record

ArticleToxics2023

The Health Risk and Source Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the Soil of Industrial Cities in India.

Tapan Kumar Sankar, Amit Kumar, Dilip Kumar Mahto, Kailash Chandra Das, Prakash Narayan, Manish Fukate, Prashant Awachat, Dhanshri Padghan, Faruq Mohammad, Hamad A Al-Lohedan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Tapan Kumar SankarSchool of Science, Engineering and Technology, G H Raisoni University, Amravati 444701, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0273-2099
Amit KumarDepartment of Environmental Engineering and Management, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 43149, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3319-8602
Dilip Kumar MahtoDepartment of Chemistry, National Institute of Technology, Jamshedpur 831014, India.
Kailash Chandra DasSchool of Science, Engineering and Technology, G H Raisoni University, Amravati 444701, India.
Prakash NarayanSchool of Science, Engineering and Technology, G H Raisoni University, Amravati 444701, India.
Manish FukateSchool of Science, Engineering and Technology, G H Raisoni University, Amravati 444701, India.
Prashant AwachatSchool of Science, Engineering and Technology, G H Raisoni University, Amravati 444701, India.
Dhanshri PadghanSchool of Science, Engineering and Technology, G H Raisoni University, Amravati 444701, India.
Faruq MohammadDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9318-9986
Hamad A Al-LohedanDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8228-4665
Ahmed A SoleimanCollege of Sciences and Engineering, Southern University and A&M College, Baton Rouge, LA 70813, USA.
Balram AmbadeDepartment of Chemistry, National Institute of Technology, Jamshedpur 831014, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9294-7378
King Saud University · SANational Institute of Technology Jamshedpur · INChaoyang University of Technology · TWSouthern University and Agricultural and Mechanical College · US

Funding

king saud university (RSP2023R355),
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Industrial areas play an important role in the urban ecosystem. Industrial site environmental quality is linked to human health. Soil samples from two different cities in India, Jamshedpur and Amravati, were collected and analyzed to assess the sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in industrial areas and their potential health risks. The total concentration of 16 PAHs in JSR (Jamshedpur) varied from 1662.90 to 10,879.20 ng/g, whereas the concentration ranged from 1456.22 to 5403.45 ng/g in the soil of AMT (Amravati). The PAHs in the samples were dominated by four-ring PAHs, followed by five-ring PAHs, and a small percentage of two-ring PAHs. The ILCR (incremental lifetime cancer risk) of the soil of Amravati was lower compared to that of Jamshedpur. The risk due to PAH exposure for children and adults was reported to be in the order of ingestion > dermal contact > inhalation while for adolescents it was dermal contact > ingestion > inhalation in Jamshedpur. In contrast, in the soil of Amravati, the PAH exposure path risk for children and adolescents were the same and showed the following order: dermal contact > ingestion > inhalation while for the adulthood age group, the order was ingestion > dermal contact > inhalation. The diagnostic ratio approach was used to assess the sources of PAHs in various environmental media. The PAH sources were mainly dominated by coal and petroleum/oil combustion. As both the study areas belong to industrial sites, the significant sources were industrial emissions, followed by traffic emissions, coal combustion for domestic livelihood, as well as due to the geographical location of the sampling sites. The results of this investigation provide novel information for contamination evaluation and human health risk assessment in PAH-contaminated sites in India.

Indexed as

diagnostics ratioILCRindustrial areaPAHspotential risk

Identifiers

PMID37368615
PMCPMC10302865
OpenAlexW4380052907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.