Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37368569›Full record

ArticleSports (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Electromyographic and Stabilometric Analysis of the Static and Dynamic "Standing Bird Dog" Exercise.

Raffaele Losavio, Samuele Contemori, Stefano Bartoli, Cristina V Dieni, Roberto Panichi, Andrea Biscarini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Raffaele LosavioDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Samuele ContemoriCentre for Sensorimotor Performance, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4071, Australia.
Stefano BartoliDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 06132 Perugia, Italy.
Cristina V DieniDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1632-5590
Roberto PanichiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 06132 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9081-8513
Andrea BiscariniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 06132 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0513-8805
University of Perugia · ITThe University of Queensland · AUUniversidad de Salamanca · ESUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The "bird dog" exercise is considered one of the most effective therapeutic exercises for lumbopelvic rehabilitation and the prevention and treatment of low back pain. The "standing bird dog" (SBD) exercise, executed in a single-leg stance, constitutes a natural and challenging variation in the "bird dog"; nevertheless, this exercise has not yet been investigated. This study provides a stabilometric and electromyographic analysis of the SBD performed in static and dynamic conditions and in ipsilateral and contralateral variations; (2) Methods: A time-synchronized motion capture system, wireless electromyography sensors, and triaxial force platform were used to analyze the selected SBD exercises; (3) Results: In dynamic conditions, the gluteus maximum, multifidus, lumbar erector spinae, and gluteus medius reached a mean activation level higher than in the static condition, with peak activation levels of 80%, 60%, 55%, and a 45% maximum voluntary isometric contraction, respectively. In the static condition, balance control was more challenging in the mediolateral compared to the anteroposterior direction. In the dynamic condition, the balance challenge was higher in the anteroposterior direction and higher than the static condition in both directions; (4) Conclusions: The SBD was proved to be effective for strengthening the hip and lumbar extensor muscles and provided a powerful challenge to single-leg balance control in both mediolateral and anteroposterior directions.

Indexed as

biomechanicsEMGexerciselow back painlumbo–pelvic–hip complexrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID37368569
PMCPMC10305076
OpenAlexW4380990710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.