Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37368543›Full record

ReviewTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2023

Deep Learning Approaches with Digital Mammography for Evaluating Breast Cancer Risk, a Narrative Review.

Maham Siddique, Michael Liu, Phuong Duong, Sachin Jambawalikar, Richard Ha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maham SiddiqueDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Michael LiuDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Phuong DuongDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6313-9603
Sachin JambawalikarDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1839-6798
Richard HaDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. Current screening regimens and clinical breast cancer risk assessment models use risk factors such as demographics and patient history to guide policy and assess risk. Applications of artificial intelligence methods (AI) such as deep learning (DL) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to evaluate individual patient information and imaging showed promise as personalized risk models. We reviewed the current literature for studies related to deep learning and convolutional neural networks with digital mammography for assessing breast cancer risk. We discussed the literature and examined the ongoing and future applications of deep learning techniques in breast cancer risk modeling.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningArtificial IntelligenceBreastFemaleHumansMammographybreast cancer riskconvolutional neural networkdeep learningdigital mammography

Identifiers

PMID37368543
PMCPMC10302037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.