Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37368415›Full record

ReviewSeminars in dialysis

Intradialytic techniques for automatic and everyday access monitoring.

Daniel Schneditz, Werner Ribitsch, David F Keane

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in dialysis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel SchneditzOtto Loewi Research Center, Division of Physiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0124-1012
Werner RibitschDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9127-1839
David F KeaneCÚRAM Science Foundation Ireland, Research Centre for Medical Devices, Health Research Board, Clinical Research Facility Galway, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-4744-4106
Medical University of Graz · ATScience Foundation Ireland · IE

Funding

DFK is supported by a Research Centre grant from Science Foundation Ireland [grant number RC/2073_P2 (CÚRAM)]
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vascular access dysfunction is associated with reduced delivery of dialysis, unplanned admissions, patient symptoms, and loss of access, making assessment of vascular access a fundamental part of routine care in dialysis. Clinical trials to predict the risk of access thrombosis based on accepted reference methods of access performance have been disappointing. Reference methods are time-consuming, affect the delivery of dialysis, and therefore cannot repeatedly be used with every dialysis session. There is now a new focus on data continuously and regularly collected with every dialysis treatment, directly or indirectly associated with access function, and without interrupting or affecting the delivered dose of dialysis. This narrative review will focus on techniques that can be used continuously or intermittently during dialysis, taking advantage of methods integrated into the dialysis machine and which do not affect the delivery of dialysis. Examples include extracorporeal blood flow, dynamic line pressures, effective clearance, dose of delivered dialysis, and recirculation which are all routinely measured on most modern dialysis machines. Integrated information collected throughout every dialysis session and analyzed by expert systems and machine learning has the potential to improve the identification of accesses at risk of thrombosis.

Indexed as

Arteriovenous Shunt, SurgicalKidney Failure, ChronicRenal DialysisThrombosisHumansMonitoring, Physiologic

Identifiers

PMID37368415
PMCPMC11867154
OpenAlexW4382182462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.