Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37368140›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2023

Image-based phenomic prediction can provide valuable decision support in wheat breeding.

Lukas Roth, Dario Fossati, Patrick Krähenbühl, Achim Walter, Andreas Hund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genome-wide association study and genomic selection of spike-related traits in bread wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frost Damage Index: The Antipode of Growing Degree Days.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lukas RothInstitute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 2, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland. lukas.roth@usys.ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1435-9535
Dario FossatiAgroscope, 1260, Nyon, Switzerland.
Patrick KrähenbühlDelley Samen und Pflanzen AG, Route de Portalban 40, 1567, Delley, Switzerland.
Achim WalterInstitute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 2, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andreas HundInstitute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 2, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

Innosuisse - Schweizerische Agentur für Innovationsförderung KTI P-Nr 27059.2 PFLS-LS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageGenotype-by-environment interactions of secondary traits based on high-throughput field phenotyping are less complex than those of target traits, allowing for a phenomic selection in unreplicated early generation trials. Traditionally, breeders' selection decisions in early generations are largely based on visual observations in the field. With the advent of affordable genome sequencing and high-throughput phenotyping technologies, enhancing breeders' ratings with such information became attractive. In this research, it is hypothesized that G[Formula: see text]E interactions of secondary traits (i.e., growth dynamics' traits) are less complex than those of related target traits (e.g., yield). Thus, phenomic selection (PS) may allow selecting for genotypes with beneficial response-pattern in a defined population of environments. A set of 45 winter wheat varieties was grown at 5 year-sites and analyzed with linear and factor-analytic (FA) mixed models to estimate G[Formula: see text]E interactions of secondary and target traits. The dynamic development of drone-derived plant height, leaf area and tiller density estimations was used to estimate the timing of key stages, quantities at defined time points and temperature dose-response curve parameters. Most of these secondary traits and grain protein content showed little G[Formula: see text]E interactions. In contrast, the modeling of G[Formula: see text]E for yield required a FA model with two factors. A trained PS model predicted overall yield performance, yield stability and grain protein content with correlations of 0.43, 0.30 and 0.34. While these accuracies are modest and do not outperform well-trained GS models, PS additionally provided insights into the physiological basis of target traits. An ideotype was identified that potentially avoids the negative pleiotropic effects between yield and protein content.

Indexed as

Grain ProteinsPhenomicsEdible GrainGenotypePhenotypePlant BreedingSelection, GeneticTriticumGrain Proteins

Identifiers

PMID37368140
PMCPMC10299972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.