Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37368111›Full record

Trial reportEuropean radiology2023

Ethnic diversity in treatment response for colorectal cancer: proof of concept for radiomics-driven enrichment trials.

Laurent Dercle, Melissa Yang, Mithat Gönen, Jessica Flynn, Chaya S Moskowitz, Dana E Connors, Hao Yang, Lin Lu, Diane Reidy-Lagunes, Tito Fojo and 4 more

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Laurent DercleDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York Presbyterian Hospital, 710 West 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA. ld2752@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1322-0710
Melissa YangDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York Presbyterian Hospital, 710 West 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Mithat GönenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Jessica FlynnDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Chaya S MoskowitzDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Dana E ConnorsFoundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH), 11400 Rockville Pike, Suite 600, North Bethesda, MD, 20852, USA.
Hao YangDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York Presbyterian Hospital, 710 West 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Lin LuDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York Presbyterian Hospital, 710 West 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Diane Reidy-LagunesMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Tito FojoColumbia University Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, 161 Fort Washington Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Sanja KarovicInova Center for Personalized Health and Schar Cancer Institute, 8100 Innovation Park Dr, Fairfax, VA, 22031, USA.
Binsheng ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York Presbyterian Hospital, 710 West 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Lawrence H SchwartzDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York Presbyterian Hospital, 710 West 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Brian S HenickColumbia University Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, 161 Fort Washington Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USFoundation for the National Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral barriers hamper recruitment of diverse patient populations in multicenter clinical trials which determine efficacy of new systemic cancer therapies. PURPOSE: We assessed if quantitative analysis of computed tomography (CT) scans of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients using imaging features that predict overall survival (OS) can unravel the association between ethnicity and efficacy.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed CT images from 1584 mCRC patients in two phase III trials evaluating FOLFOX ± panitumumab (n = 331, 350) and FOLFIRI ± aflibercept (n = 437, 466) collected from August 2006 to March 2013. Primary and secondary endpoints compared RECIST1.1 response at month-2 and delta tumor volume at month-2, respectively. An ancillary study compared imaging phenotype using a peer-reviewed radiomics-signature combining 3 imaging features to predict OS landmarked from month-2. Analysis was stratified by ethnicity.

resultsIn total, 1584 patients were included (mean age, 60.25 ± 10.57 years; 969 men). Ethnicity was as follows: African (n = 50, 3.2%), Asian (n = 66, 4.2%), Caucasian (n = 1413, 89.2%), Latino (n = 27, 1.7%), Other (n = 28, 1.8%). Overall baseline tumor volume demonstrated Africans and Caucasians had more advanced disease (p < 0.001). Ethnicity was associated with treatment response. Response per RECIST1.1 at month-2 was distinct between ethnicities (p = 0.048) with higher response rate (55.6%) in Latinos. Overall delta tumor volume at month-2 demonstrated that Latino patients more likely experienced response to treatment (p = 0.021). Radiomics phenotype was also distinct in terms of tumor radiomics heterogeneity (p = 0.023).

conclusionThis study highlights how clinical trials that inadequately represent minority groups may impact associated translational work. In appropriately powered studies, radiomics features may allow us to unravel associations between ethnicity and treatment efficacy, better elucidate mechanisms of resistance, and promote diversity in trials through predictive enrichment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Radiomics could promote clinical trial diversity through predictive enrichment, hence benefit to historically underrepresented racial/ethnic groups that may respond variably to treatment due to socioeconomic factors and built environment, collectively referred to as social determinants of health. KEY POINTS: •Findings indicate ethnicity was associated with treatment response across all 3 endpoints. First, response per RECIST1.1 at month-2 was distinct between ethnicities (p = 0.048) with higher response rate (55.6%) in Latinos. •Second, the overall delta tumor volume at month-2 demonstrated that Latino patients were more likely to experience response to treatment (p = 0.021). Radiomics phenotype was also distinct in terms of tumor radiomics heterogeneity (p = 0.023).

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedEthnicityHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeArtificial intelligenceColorectal neoplasmsEthnicityTomographyTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID37368111
OpenAlexW4382181533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.