Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37368078›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2023

Value and limitations of machine learning in high-frequency nutrient data for gap-filling, forecasting, and transport process interpretation.

Victoria Barcala, Joachim Rozemeijer, Kevin Ouwerkerk, Laurens Gerner, Leonard Osté

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Victoria BarcalaUnit Inland Water Systems, Daltonlaan 600, 3584 BK, Utrecht, The Netherlands. victoria.barcalapaolillo@deltares.nl.
Joachim RozemeijerUnit Subsurface and Groundwater Systems, Daltonlaan 600, 3584 BK, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kevin OuwerkerkUnit Subsurface and Groundwater Systems, Daltonlaan 600, 3584 BK, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Laurens GernerWater Board Rijn and IJssel, Liemersweg 2, 7006 GG, Doetinchem, The Netherlands.
Leonard OstéUnit Inland Water Systems, Daltonlaan 600, 3584 BK, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 813438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-frequency monitoring of water quality in catchments brings along the challenge of post-processing large amounts of data. Moreover, monitoring stations are often remote and technical issues resulting in data gaps are common. Machine learning algorithms can be applied to fill these gaps, and to a certain extent, for predictions and interpretation. The objectives of this study were (1) to evaluate six different machine learning models for gap-filling in a high-frequency nitrate and total phosphorus concentration time series, (2) to showcase the potential added value (and limitations) of machine learning to interpret underlying processes, and (3) to study the limits of machine learning algorithms for predictions outside the training period. We used a 4-year high-frequency dataset from a ditch draining one intensive dairy farm in the east of The Netherlands. Continuous time series of precipitation, evapotranspiration, groundwater levels, discharge, turbidity, and nitrate or total phosphorus were used as predictors for total phosphorus and nitrate concentrations respectively. Our results showed that the random forest algorithm had the best performance to fill in data-gaps, with R

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringNitratesMachine LearningPhosphorusWater QualityNitratesPhosphorusData-based modelsGroundwater surface water interactionsMissing dataRandom forestWater management

Identifiers

PMID37368078
PMCPMC10299926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.