Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37367966›Full record

ReviewAmino acids2023

In the quest for histone deacetylase inhibitors: current trends in the application of multilayered computational methods.

Abdullahi Ibrahim Uba, Gokhan Zengin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Amino acids, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abdullahi Ibrahim UbaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Istanbul AREL University, Istanbul, 34537, Turkey. abdullahi.iu2@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0853-108X
Gokhan ZenginDepartment of Biology, Science Faculty, Selcuk University, Konya, 42130, Turkey. gokhanzengin@selcuk.edu.tr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6548-7823
Istanbul Arel University · TRSelçuk University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have gained attention over the past three decades because of their potential in the treatment of different diseases including various forms of cancers, neurodegenerative disorders, autoimmune, inflammatory diseases, and other metabolic disorders. To date, 5 HDAC inhibitor drugs are marketed for the treatment of hematological malignancies and several drug-candidate HDAC inhibitors are at different stages of clinical trials. However, due to the toxic side effects of these drugs resulting from the lack of target selectivity, active studies are ongoing to design and develop either class-selective or isoform-selective inhibitors. Computational methods have aided the discovery of HDAC inhibitors with the desired potency and/or selectivity. These methods include ligand-based approaches such as scaffold hopping, pharmacophore modeling, three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships (3D-QSAR); and structure-based virtual screening (molecular docking). The current trends involve the application of the combination of these methods and incorporating molecular dynamics simulations coupled with Poisson-Boltzmann/molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area (MM-PBSA/MM-GBSA) to improve the prediction of ligand binding affinity. This review aimed at understanding the current trends in applying these multilayered strategies and their contribution to the design/identification of HDAC inhibitors.

Indexed as

Histone Deacetylase InhibitorsMolecular Dynamics SimulationLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsLigandsHDAC inhibitorsLigand-based and structure-based methodsMD simulationMM-PBSA/MM-GBSASelectivity

Identifiers

PMID37367966
OpenAlexW4382181708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.