ArticleAging2023
Identification and validation of a 7-genes prognostic signature for adult acute myeloid leukemia based on aging-related genes.
Article in Aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognosis of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Based on TP53 Mutation Among Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Iranian journal of pathology · 2026Review
- A proteogenomic gene signature defines prognostic subgroups highlighting PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway as a therapeutic vulnerability in myeloid malignancies.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore effects of aging-related genes (ARGs) on the prognosis of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), a seven-ARGs signature was developed and validated in AML patients. The numbers of seven-ARG sequences were selected to construct the survival prognostic signature in TCGA-LAML cohort, and two GEO datasets were used independently to verify the prognostic values of signature. According to seven-ARGs signature, patients were categorized into two subgroups. Patients with high-risk prognostic score were defined as HRPS-group/high-risk group, while others were set as LRPS-group/low-risk group. HRPS-group presented adverse overall survival (OS) than LRPS-group in TCGA-AML cohort (HR=3.39,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.