ReviewMetabolites2023
Metabolomic Analysis in Neurocritical Care Patients.
Review in Metabolites, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tapping into Metabolomics for Understanding Host and Rotavirus Group A Interactome.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolomics is the analytical study of metabolites in biological matrices using high-throughput profiling. Traditionally, the metabolome has been studied to identify various biomarkers for the diagnosis and pathophysiology of disease. Over the last decade, metabolomic research has grown to include the identification of prognostic markers, the development of novel treatment strategies, and the prediction of disease severity. In this review, we summarized the available evidence on the use of metabolome profiling in neurocritical care populations. Specifically, we focused on aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, and intracranial hemorrhage to identify the gaps in the current literature and to provide direction for future studies. A primary literature search of the Medline and EMBASE databases was conducted. Upon removing duplicate studies, abstract screening and full-text screening were performed. We screened 648 studies and extracted data from 17 studies. Based on the current evidence, the utility of metabolomic profiling has been limited due to inconsistencies amongst studies and a lack of reproducible data. Studies identified various biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment modification. However, studies evaluated and identified different metabolites, resulting in an inability to compare the study results. Future research towards addressing the gaps in the current literature, including reproducing data on the use of specific metabolite panels, is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.