ArticleMembranes2023
Modelling the Performance of Electrically Conductive Nanofiltration Membranes.
Article in Membranes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced Bio-Membrane Technologies for Water Treatment: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Future Prospects-A Comprehensive Critical Review.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026Review
- MXene/Carbon Nanocomposites for Water Treatment.Membranes · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electrically conductive membranes are a class of stimuli-responsive materials, which allow the adjustment of selectivity for and the rejection of charged species by varying the surface potential. The electrical assistance provides a powerful tool for overcoming the selectivity-permeability trade-off due to its interaction with charged solutes, allowing the passage of neutral solvent molecules. In this work, a mathematical model for the nanofiltration of binary aqueous electrolytes by an electrically conductive membrane is proposed. The model takes into account the steric as well as Donnan exclusion of charged species due to the simultaneous presence of chemical and electronic surface charges. It is shown that the rejection reaches its minimum at the potential of zero charge (PZC), where the electronic and chemical charges compensate for each other. The rejection increases when the surface potential varies in positive and negative directions with respect to the PZC. The proposed model is successfully applied to a description of experimental data on the rejection of salts and anionic dyes by PANi-PSS/CNT and MXene/CNT nanofiltration membranes. The results provide new insights into the selectivity mechanisms of conductive membranes and can be employed to describe electrically enhanced nanofiltration processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.