ArticleMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Patient Dietary Supplements Use: Do Results from Natural Language Processing of Clinical Notes Agree with Survey Data?
Article in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Review of Challenges in Performing Real-World Evidence Studies for Nonprescription Products.Pragmatic and observational research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There is widespread use of dietary supplements, some prescribed but many taken without a physician's guidance. There are many potential interactions between supplements and both over-the-counter and prescription medications in ways that are unknown to patients. Structured medical records do not adequately document supplement use; however, unstructured clinical notes often contain extra information on supplements. We studied a group of 377 patients from three healthcare facilities and developed a natural language processing (NLP) tool to detect supplement use. Using surveys of these patients, we investigated the correlation between self-reported supplement use and NLP extractions from the clinical notes. Our model achieved an F1 score of 0.914 for detecting all supplements. Individual supplement detection had a variable correlation with survey responses, ranging from an F1 of 0.83 for calcium to an F1 of 0.39 for folic acid. Our study demonstrated good NLP performance while also finding that self-reported supplement use is not always consistent with the documented use in clinical records.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.