ArticleJournal of Intelligence2023
Modern Assessments of Intelligence Must Be Fair and Equitable.
Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Task Engagement in Matrix Reasoning Performance: A Cross-Cultural Investigation in China and the United Kingdom.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
- From Abstract to Domain-Specific: Development and Validation of Matrix Reasoning Tasks for Students in Biology.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
- Higher trait working memory capacity may benefit standardized test performance under race-related stereotype threat.Memory & cognition · 2025Article
- Assessing Comprehensive Spatial Ability and Specific Attributes Through Higher-Order LLM.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
- Rethinking Intelligence: Implications for Teachers and Students in Barbadian Schools.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
- Cognitive Function in Peri- and Postmenopausal Women: Implications for Considering Iron Supplementation.Nutrients · 2025Review
- The Relationship Between Game-Related Assessment and Traditional Measures of Cognitive Ability-A Meta-Analysis.Journal of Intelligence · 2024Article
- Assessment of Human Intelligence-The State of the Art in the 2020s.Journal of Intelligence · 2024Article
- Intelligence Assessment of Children & Youth Benefiting from Psychological-Educational Support System in Poland.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Relationship between Thinking Dispositions, Working Memory, and Critical Thinking Ability in Adolescents: A Longitudinal Cross-Lagged Analysis.Journal of Intelligence · 2024Article
- Contextualizing Positionality, Intersectionality, and Intelligence in the Anthropocene.Journal of Intelligence · 2024Article
- Applying the Discrepancy Consistency Method on CAS-2: Brief Data in a Sample of Greek-Speaking Children.Journal of Intelligence · 2024Article
- Racial and ethnic disparities in psychological care for individuals with FASD: a dis/ability studies and critical race theory perspective toward improving prevention, assessment/diagnosis, and intervention.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Validation of Hamdan intelligence scale in upper elementary grades using the Rasch model: exploratory study.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- The Intellectual Profile of Adults with Specific Learning Disabilities.Journal of Intelligence · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Historically, assessments of human intelligence have been virtually synonymous with practices that contributed to forms of inequality and injustice. As such, modern considerations for assessing human intelligence must focus on equity and fairness. First, we highlight the array of diversity, equity, and inclusion concerns in assessment practices and discuss strategies for addressing them. Next, we define a modern, non-
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.