Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37367421›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2023

Invasive and Non-Invasive Diagnostic Pathways in the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis.

Alexandros Briasoulis, Dimitrios Bampatsias, Adamantia Papamichail, Toshiki Kuno, John Skoularigis, Andrew Xanthopoulos, Filippos Triposkiadis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Cardiac Amyloid, The Great Imitator.JACC. Case reports · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Current Perspectives on Atrial Amyloidosis: A Narrative Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Review
  15. Light-Chain Amyloidosis: The Great Impostor.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandros BriasoulisAmyloidosis Center, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 80 Vasilissis Sophias Avenue, 11528 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5740-9670
Dimitrios BampatsiasAmyloidosis Center, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 80 Vasilissis Sophias Avenue, 11528 Athens, Greece.
Adamantia PapamichailAmyloidosis Center, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 80 Vasilissis Sophias Avenue, 11528 Athens, Greece.
Toshiki KunoMontefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10467, USA.
John SkoularigisDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-7159-2478
Andrew XanthopoulosDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9439-3946
Filippos TriposkiadisDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-6433-4016
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUniversity Hospital of Larissa · GRMontefiore Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The appropriate diagnosis and subtyping of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is frequently missed or delayed due to its vague presentation, clinical overlapping, and diagnostic pitfalls. Recent developments in both invasive and non-invasive diagnostic techniques have significantly changed the diagnostic approach of CA. With the present review, we aim to summarize the current diagnostic approach of CA and to underline the indications of tissue biopsy, either surrogate site or myocardial. The most important factor for timely diagnosis is increased clinical suspicion, especially in certain clinical scenarios. Appropriate imaging with echocardiography or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can provide significant evidence for the diagnosis of CA. Importantly, all patients should undergo monoclonal proteins assessment, with these results significantly determining the steps to follow. A negative monoclonal protein assessment will lead to a non-invasive algorithm which, in combination with positive cardiac scintigraphy, can establish the diagnosis of ATTR-CA. The latter is the only clinical scenario in which the diagnosis can be established without the need of biopsy. However, if the imaging results are negative but the clinical suspicion remains high, a myocardial biopsy should be performed. In the case of the presence of monoclonal protein, an invasive algorithm follows, first by surrogate site sampling and then by myocardial biopsy if the results are inconclusive or prompt diagnosis is needed. The role of endomyocardial biopsy, even though limited by current advances in other techniques, is highly valuable in selected patients and is the only method to reliably establish a diagnosis in challenging cases.

Indexed as

ALATTRcardiac amyloidosisdiagnosisendomyocardial biopsy

Identifiers

PMID37367421
PMCPMC10299430
OpenAlexW4380324342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.