ArticleBiosensors2023
Imunocapture Magnetic Beads Enhanced and Ultrasensitive CRISPR-Cas13a-Assisted Electrochemical Biosensor for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2.
Article in Biosensors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a rapid, sensitive and visual reverse transcription recombinase-aided amplification coupled with lateral flow dipstick assay for influenza B virus detection.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- A CRISPR Powered Immobilization-Free, Amplification-Free Carbon-Nanotube Field-Effect Transistor (FET) Sensor for Influenza A Virus (IAV).Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- CRISPR-Cas-Based Diagnostics in Biomedicine: Principles, Applications, and Future Trajectories.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Mitigating Antibiotic Resistance: The Utilization of CRISPR Technology in Detection.Biosensors · 2024Review
- CRISPR-Based Biosensors for Medical Diagnosis: Readout from Detector-Dependence Detection Toward Naked Eye Detection.Biosensors · 2024Review
- Current Trends in RNA Virus Detection via Nucleic Acid Isothermal Amplification-Based Platforms.Biosensors · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid and ongoing spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), emphasizes the urgent need for an easy and sensitive virus detection method. Here, we describe an immunocapture magnetic bead-enhanced electrochemical biosensor for ultrasensitive SARS-CoV-2 detection based on clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins, collectively known as CRISPR-Cas13a technology. At the core of the detection process, low-cast and immobilization-free commercial screen-printed carbon electrodes are used to measure the electrochemical signal, while streptavidin-coated immunocapture magnetic beads are used to reduce the background noise signal and enhance detection ability by separating the excessive report RNA, and a combination of isothermal amplification methods in the CRISPR-Cas13a system is used for nucleic acid detection. The results showed that the sensitivity of the biosensor increased by two orders of magnitude when the magnetic beads were used. The proposed biosensor required approximately 1 h of overall processing time and demonstrated an ultrasensitive ability to detect SARS-CoV-2, which could be as low as 1.66 aM. Furthermore, owing to the programmability of the CRISPR-Cas13a system, the biosensor can be flexibly applied to other viruses, providing a new approach for powerful clinical diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.