Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37366947›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2023

Development of a Redox-Polymer-Based Electrochemical Glucose Biosensor Suitable for Integration in Microfluidic 3D Cell Culture Systems.

L Navarro-Nateras, Jancarlo Diaz-Gonzalez, Diana Aguas-Chantes, Lucy L Coria-Oriundo, Fernando Battaglini, José Luis Ventura-Gallegos, Alejandro Zentella-Dehesa, Goldie Oza, L G Arriaga, Jannu R Casanova-Moreno

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

L Navarro-NaterasCentro de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico en Electroquímica, Pedro Escobedo 76703, Querétaro, Mexico.
Jancarlo Diaz-GonzalezCentro de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico en Electroquímica, Pedro Escobedo 76703, Querétaro, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9609-2621
Diana Aguas-ChantesCentro de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico en Electroquímica, Pedro Escobedo 76703, Querétaro, Mexico.
Lucy L Coria-OriundoInstituto de Química Física de los Materiales, Medio Ambiente y Energía, CONICET-Departamento de Química Inorgánica, Analítica y Química Física, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1428EGA, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-3502-4726
Fernando BattagliniInstituto de Química Física de los Materiales, Medio Ambiente y Energía, CONICET-Departamento de Química Inorgánica, Analítica y Química Física, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1428EGA, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-1113-1642
José Luis Ventura-GallegosDepartamento de Medicina Genómica y Toxicología Ambiental, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico.
Alejandro Zentella-DehesaDepartamento de Medicina Genómica y Toxicología Ambiental, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico.
Goldie OzaCentro de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico en Electroquímica, Pedro Escobedo 76703, Querétaro, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-1051-0795
L G ArriagaCentro de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico en Electroquímica, Pedro Escobedo 76703, Querétaro, Mexico.
Jannu R Casanova-MorenoCentro de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico en Electroquímica, Pedro Escobedo 76703, Querétaro, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-4378-6421
Center of Research and Technologic Development in Electrochemistry · MXConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARInstituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

Center of Research and Technologic Development in Electrochemistry PI.230033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inclusion of online, in situ biosensors in microfluidic cell cultures is important to monitor and characterize a physiologically mimicking environment. This work presents the performance of second-generation electrochemical enzymatic biosensors to detect glucose in cell culture media. Glutaraldehyde and ethylene glycol diglycidyl ether (EGDGE) were tested as cross-linkers to immobilize glucose oxidase and an osmium-modified redox polymer on the surface of carbon electrodes. Tests employing screen printed electrodes showed adequate performance in a Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI-1640) media spiked with fetal bovine serum (FBS). Comparable first-generation sensors were shown to be heavily affected by complex biological media. This difference is explained in terms of the respective charge transfer mechanisms. Under the tested conditions, electron hopping between Os redox centers was less vulnerable than H

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesGlucoseCell Culture Techniques, Three DimensionalElectrochemical TechniquesElectrodesEnzymes, ImmobilizedGlucose OxidaseHydrogen PeroxideMicrofluidicsOxidation-ReductionPolymersEnzymes, ImmobilizedGlucoseGlucose OxidaseHydrogen PeroxidePolymers3D cell culturecross-linkingEGDGEglucose electrochemical biosensorglucose oxidaseglutaraldehydeon-chip evaluation

Identifiers

PMID37366947
PMCPMC10295976
OpenAlexW4378528295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.