Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37366894›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2023

HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer Treatment in the First-Line Setting: Expert Review.

Katarzyna J Jerzak, Nathaniel Bouganim, Christine Brezden-Masley, Scott Edwards, Karen Gelmon, Jan-Willem Henning, John F Hilton, Sandeep Sehdev

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Oncology letters · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Cardiac safety of ribociclib evaluated with 24-hour rhythm Holter electrocardiogram.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Katarzyna J JerzakOdette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Nathaniel BouganimCedars Cancer Centre, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.
Christine Brezden-MasleyMarvelle Koffler Breast Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada.
Scott EdwardsDr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Center, St. John's, NL A1B 3V6, Canada.
Karen GelmonFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Jan-Willem HenningTom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary AB T2N 4N2, Canada.
John F HiltonThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
Sandeep SehdevThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7434-2263
Ottawa Hospital · CADr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The approval of CDK4/6 inhibitors has dramatically improved care for the treatment of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer, but navigating the rapidly-expanding treatment evidence base is challenging. In this narrative review, we provide best-practice recommendations for the first-line treatment of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer in Canada based on relevant literature, clinical guidelines, and our own clinical experience. Due to statistically significant improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival, ribociclib + aromatase inhibitor is our preferred first-line treatment for de novo advanced disease or relapse ≥12 months after completion of adjuvant endocrine therapy and ribociclib or abemaciclib + fulvestrant is our preferred first-line treatment for patients experiencing early relapse. Abemaciclib or palbociclib may be used when alternatives to ribociclib are needed, and endocrine therapy can be used alone in the case of contraindication to CDK4/6 inhibitors or limited life expectancy. Considerations for special populations-including frail and fit elderly patients, as well as those with visceral disease, brain metastases, and oligometastatic disease-are also explored. For monitoring, we recommend an approach across CDK4/6 inhibitors. For mutational testing, we recommend routinely performing ER/PR/HER2 testing to confirm the subtype of advanced disease at the time of progression and to consider

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAgedAminopyridinesBenzimidazolesFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPurinesabemaciclibAminopyridinesBenzimidazolesPurinesribociclibadvanced breast cancerCDK4/6 inhibitorsHR+/HER2–mutational testingtreatment considerations

Identifiers

PMID37366894
PMCPMC10297170
OpenAlexW4379232529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.