Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37366716›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Transfer Effect of Cognitive Advantages in Visual Working Memory Capacity: Evidence from Elite Football Players.

Xiaomei Wang, Zhigang Liu, Huanyu Zhang, Chaoxin Ji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaomei WangPhysical Education Department, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China.
Zhigang LiuAviation Physical Education Department, Aviation University of Air Force, Changchun 130022, China.
Huanyu ZhangAviation Physical Education Department, Aviation University of Air Force, Changchun 130022, China.
Chaoxin JiPhysical Education Department, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3817-2257

Funding

Social Science Foundation of Liaoning Province L19CTY001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe research has indicated that elite football players demonstrate cognitive advantages in visual working memory capacity (VWMC); however, it remains unclear whether this effect transfers to other domains cognitive advantages. OBJECT: This study investigated the VWMC differences between elite football players and novices, with a particular focus on cognitive advantages.

methodsElite football players (specialized in football) and novices were selected to complete the VWMC test task under three different stimulus conditions, then the differences in the VWMCs of elite football players and novices were analyzed.

resultsIn comparison to novices, elite football players demonstrated cognitive advantages in VWMCs, along with a possible transfer effect. Additionally, the study showed that the reaction times among elite football players and novices differed, with elite players demonstrating shorter reaction times, which is a difference that was amplified as the number of stimuli increased.

conclusionThe VWMCs of elite football players was better than that of novices under professional and meaningless conditions, which indicates that the VWMCs of elite football players has a transfer effect. Through further analysis of the reaction times cognitive advantages, it was found that there are significant differences between elite football players and novices when responding to the stimuli in both professional and meaningless conditions.

Indexed as

cognitive advantageselite football playersnovicestransfer effectvisual working memory capacity

Identifiers

PMID37366716
PMCPMC10295064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.