ReviewDentistry journal2023
The Use of Zirconia for Implant-Supported Fixed Complete Dental Prostheses: A Narrative Review.
Review in Dentistry journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of lithium disilicate and feldspathic CAD-on systems in implant-supported crowns: a combined mechanical testing and FEA study.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Article
- Five-year survival and failure patterns of complete arch fixed implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses: A retrospective analysis of 3300 laboratory cases.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2026Article
- Hierarchical Variance in Early Marginal Bone Change in Monolithic Zirconia Full-Arch Implant Prostheses: A Multilevel Prospective Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Consensus Statement on Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitations: Evidence-Based Recommendations from the Italian Consensus Conference.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes and complications of full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: a 4-10 year retrospective study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Fracture resistance of premolar screw-retained implant-supported hybrid abutment crowns with monolithic restorations after thermomechanical aging.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2026Article
- Can monolithic zirconia frameworks in implant-supported cross-arch prostheses deliver reliable long-term outcomes?Evidence-based dentistry · 2025Article
- Article
- Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Supported Restorations: Techniques Review and Proposal for Improvement.Dentistry journal · 2024Review
- Article
- Impact of Prosthetic Material and Restoration Type on Peri-Implant Bone Resorption: A Retrospective Analysis in a Romanian Sample.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Long-term Outcomes of Tooth-implant Supported Prostheses - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Annals of maxillofacial surgeryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The success of implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses (ISFCDPs) depends on multiple factors: some are related to the fixtures, such as fixture material, surface characteristics, positioning, and type of connection to prosthetic components; others are related to the prostheses, such as design and materials used. Zirconia is a material widely used in fixed prosthodontics, whether on natural teeth or on implants, with excellent results over time. Regarding the use of zirconia for ISFCDPs, the 2018 ITI Consensus Report stated that "implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses may be a future option with more supporting evidence". Since CAD/CAM technology and zirconia are being continuously innovated to achieve better results and performances over time, a narrative review of the literature seems necessary to focus research efforts towards effective and durable solutions for implant-supported, full-arch rehabilitations. The objective of the present narrative review was to search the literature for studies regarding the clinical performance of zirconia-based ISFCDPs. According to the results of this review, the use of zirconia for ISFCDPs showed good clinical outcomes, with high survival rates ranging from 88% to 100% and prosthetic complications that were restorable by the clinicians in most cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.