Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37366583›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2023

Barriers to accessing and receiving antenatal care: Findings from interviews with Australian women experiencing disadvantage.

Sarah V Penman, Ruth M Beatson, Elizabeth H Walker, Sharon Goldfeld, Carly S Molloy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah V PenmanMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Ruth M BeatsonMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Elizabeth H WalkerMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Sharon GoldfeldMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Carly S MolloyMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8570-6421

Funding

Australian National Health and Medical Research Council APP1155290Eureka Benevolent FoundationPaul Ramsay FoundationVictorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo identify the barriers associated with inadequate antenatal attendance by disadvantaged women in Australia and to further explore how these barriers are experienced by this population group.

designA qualitative descriptive study utilizing semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis.

methodsInterviews were conducted with 11 pregnant women who self-identified as experiencing disadvantage, purposively sampled from a local government area of Victoria, Australia, characterized by socio-economic disadvantage. Data were collected from February to July 2019.

resultsStudy participants reported a range of barriers to receiving timely and adequate antenatal care (ANC). For several women, a combination of personal (e.g., emotions, knowledge), health service provision (e.g., limited access to continuity of care provider and continuity of information, inflexible scheduling, difficulty travelling, staff attitudes), and broader social-contextual factors (e.g., financial situation, language, cultural norms) were ultimately insurmountable. Whereas some barriers were experienced as hassles or annoyances, others were unacceptable, overwhelming, or humiliating.

conclusionWomen experiencing disadvantage in Australia value ANC but face multiple and complex barriers that undermine timely and regular access. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/PATIENT CARE: A wide range of strategies targeting barriers across multiple levels of the social-ecological environment are required if ANC attendance rates are to improve and ultimately redress existing health disparities. Various continuity of care models are well-placed to address many of the identified barriers and should be made more accessible to women, and particularly those women experiencing disadvantage. IMPACT: Antenatal care appointments promote the health of women and their babies during pregnancy, but for many women, particularly those experiencing disadvantage, access is delayed or inadequate. ANC providers play a critical role in facilitating timely and adequate care. Health service practitioners and management, and health services policymakers need to understand the complexity of the barriers women encounter. These stakeholders can utilize the findings reported herein to develop more effective strategies for overcoming multiple and multi-level barriers. REPORTING

methodThe study is reported in accordance with the relevant EQUATOR guidelines: the standards for reporting qualitative research (SRQR) and consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityPrenatal CareFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnant PeopleQualitative ResearchVictoriaaccess toantenatal carebarriershealth behaviourhealth careinterviewsmaternity carenursingqualitative methodssocial inequityusers' experiences

Identifiers

PMID37366583
PMCPMC10952242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.