Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37366524›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease versus other lung infections requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Boris Kuzmin, Arevik Movsisyan, Florian Praetsch, Thomas Schilling, Anke Lux, Mohammad Fadel, Faranak Azizzadeh, Julia Crackau, Olaf Keyser, George Awad and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Boris KuzminDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.
Arevik MovsisyanDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.
Florian PraetschDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.
Thomas SchillingDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.
Anke LuxInstitute of Biometry and Medical Informatics, University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.
Mohammad FadelDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.
Faranak AzizzadehDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.
Julia CrackauDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.
Olaf KeyserDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.
George AwadDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.
Thomas HachenbergDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.
Jens WippermannDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.
Maximilian SchernerDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) often develop severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV), and venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO).Mortality in COVID-19 patients on V-V ECMO was exceptionally high; therefore, whether survival can be ameliorated should be investigated. Methods: We collected data from 85 patients with severe ARDS who required ECMO support at the University Hospital Magdeburg from 2014 to 2021. The patients were divided into the COVID-19 group (52 patients) and the non-COVID-19 group (33 patients). Demographic and pre-, intra-, and post-ECMO data were retrospectively recorded. The parameters of mechanical ventilation, laboratory data before using ECMO, and during ECMO were compared. Results: There was a significant difference between the two groups regarding survival: 38.5% of COVID-19 patients and 63.6% of non-COVID-19 patients survived 60 days (p = 0.024). COVID-19 patients required V-V ECMO after 6.5 days of MV, while non-COVID-19 patients required V-V ECMO after 2.0 days of MV (p = 0.048). The COVID-19 group had a greater proportion of patients with ischemic heart disease (21.2% vs 3%, p = 0.019). The rates of most complications were comparable in both groups, whereas the COVID-19 group showed a significantly higher rate of cerebral bleeding (23.1 vs 6.1%, p = 0.039) and lung bacterial superinfection (53.8% vs 9.1%, p = <0.001). Conclusion: The higher 60-days mortality among patients with COVID-19 with severe ARDS was attributable to superinfection, a higher risk of intracerebral bleeding, and the pre-existing ischemic heart disease.

Indexed as

Acute respiratory failureBacterial superinfectionCerebral bleedingExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationViral pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID37366524
PMCPMC10276501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.