Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37366468›Full record

ReviewExploration (Beijing, China)2021

Nanozyme for tumor therapy: Surface modification matters.

Guoheng Tang, Jiuyang He, Juewen Liu, Xiyun Yan, Kelong Fan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Exploration (Beijing, China), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Enhanced peroxidase-like activity of L-glutamic acid-coated FeAnalytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Can nanozymes achieve more than enzymes?Nature reviews. Materials · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guoheng TangCAS Engineering Laboratory for Nanozyme, Key Laboratory of Protein and Peptide Pharmaceutical, Institute of Biophysics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100101 P. R. China.
Jiuyang HeCAS Engineering Laboratory for Nanozyme, Key Laboratory of Protein and Peptide Pharmaceutical, Institute of Biophysics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100101 P. R. China.
Juewen LiuDepartment of Chemistry, Waterloo Institute for Nanotechnology University of Waterloo Waterloo Ontario N2L 3G1 Canada.
Xiyun YanCAS Engineering Laboratory for Nanozyme, Key Laboratory of Protein and Peptide Pharmaceutical, Institute of Biophysics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100101 P. R. China.
Kelong FanCAS Engineering Laboratory for Nanozyme, Key Laboratory of Protein and Peptide Pharmaceutical, Institute of Biophysics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100101 P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6285-1933

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the next generation of artificial enzymes, nanozymes have shown unique properties compared to its natural counterparts, such as stability in harsh environment, low cost, and ease of production and modification, paving the way for its biomedical applications. Among them, tumor catalytic therapy mediated by the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) has made great progress mainly from the peroxidase-like activity of nanozymes. Fe

Indexed as

cytotoxicityFe3O4 nanozymesperoxidase‐like activitysurface modificationtumor catalytic therapy

Identifiers

PMID37366468
PMCPMC10291575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.