Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37365717›Full record

ReviewNursing open2023

Coaching in nursing: An integrative literature review.

Corianne Richardson, Kristin Wicking, Narelle Biedermann, Tanya Langtree

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. How to Be Coachable.AEM education and training · 2025
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Nurses' contribution to antimicrobial stewardship: business as usual?Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Corianne RichardsonCollege of Healthcare Sciences, Nursing and Midwifery, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7258-447X
Kristin WickingCollege of Healthcare Sciences, Nursing and Midwifery, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Narelle BiedermannCollege of Healthcare Sciences, Nursing and Midwifery, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Tanya LangtreeCollege of Healthcare Sciences, Nursing and Midwifery, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo understand the current application and benefits of coaching practice in nursing and identify potential areas for future research.

designAn integrative literature review was conducted using Whittemore and Knalf integrative review methods. DATA SOURCES: A search of the literature from Medline (PubMed) and CINHAL platform for abstracts and/or full-text articles from 2012 to 2022.

methodsA systematic approach was used to screen and analyse the literature. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, a quality appraisal of the literature was undertaken and summarised into themes. Eighteen articles were selected, two articles were different aspects of the same studies. Coaching was found to have benefits to the individual related to performance, role effectiveness, role transitions and confidence in performing in the role. The outcomes for individuals add to the overall organisational benefits with performance, support, teamwork, communication and culture.

resultsThis literature review sought to understand the current use of coaching in nursing and identify any gaps in the application of coaching within the discipline. Supporting, developing staff knowledge and skills and nurturing nursing staff into the profession has occurred in several ways and evolved to include coaching. Coaching provides capabilities to enhance nursing leadership, performance improvement and to provide support to staff. The findings from this literature review found a need to conceptually define coaching in nursing and the opportunity to explore the use of coaching to support both the clinical and managerial workforce (job satisfaction, intention to stay and building resilience). The benefits of coaching in nursing extend beyond the leadership level and there is opportunity to extend the operationalisation of coaching practice and coaching training within the discipline of nursing. This integrative review explains how coaching has been utilised in nursing to be a valuable tool in developing nurse leaders and clinical staff.

Indexed as

MentoringNursing StaffClinical CompetenceHumansIntentionLeadershipclinical leadershipcoachingcoaching practicedeveloping leadershipnursingperformance developmentperformance improvement

Identifiers

PMID37365717
PMCPMC10495732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.