ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2023
Antimicrobial activity and enzymatic analysis of endophytes isolated from Codonopsis pilosula.
Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibacterial Activity of Metabolites of EndophyticInternational journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of adjunctive Chinese herbal decoction in treatingFrontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Whole-genome sequence of Pseudomonas sp. strain HOU2 isolated from dangshen (Codonopsis javanica) roots.BMC genomic data · 2024Article
- Ozone Application Suppressed the Blue Mold Development and Maintained the Main Active Ingredients Content of Postharvest FreshJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The structure and function of rhizosphere bacterial communities: impact of chemical vs. bio-organic fertilizers on root disease, quality, and yield ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The roots of the medicinal plant Codonopsis pilosula (Franch.) Nannf (C. pilosula) possess most medicinal supplements. In current research on C. pilosula root endophytes were isolated, identified, and evaluated for their antimicrobial activity against human pathogens such as Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Salmonella typhi, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the fungi Candida albicans and Aspergillus niger. Endophytes C.P-8 and C.P-20 exhibited very significant antimicrobial activity, the secondary metabolite of C.P-8 registered at retention time 24.075 by HPLC analysis. Significant minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of C.P-8 was exhibited at 250 µg/ml against S. aureus and 500 µg/ml against B. subtilis. Qualitative, quantitative analyses, and partial purification of enzymes and purity was analysed by molecular weight determined by SDS‒PAGE of enzymes produced by C.P-20, amylase-64 kDa, protease-64 kDa, chitinase-30 kDa, and cellulase-54 kDa. Optimum pH and temperature of the partially purified enzymes, was carried out. The partially purified enzymes from C.P-20 displayed maximum activity at pH 6-7 and temperatures of 40°C-45°C. Moreover, the above endophytes will be useful tools for producing active enzymes and active bioantimicrobial agents against human pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.