Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37365630›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2023

"So let me give you money, you give me what I want": decision-making priorities around contraceptive method and source choice among young women in Kenya.

Lisa M Calhoun, Mahua Mandal, Bernard Onyango, Erick Waga, Courtney McGuire, Thomas van den Akker, Lenka Beňová, Thérèse Delvaux, Eliya M Zulu, Ilene S Speizer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lisa M Calhoun *Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 123 West Franklin Street, Suite 210, NC, 27516, Chapel Hill, USA. lisa_calhoun@unc.edu.
Mahua Mandal *Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 123 West Franklin Street, Suite 210, NC, 27516, Chapel Hill, USA.
Bernard OnyangoAfrican Institute for Development Policy, Nairobi, Kenya.
Erick WagaAfrican Institute for Development Policy, Nairobi, Kenya.
Courtney McGuireCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 123 West Franklin Street, Suite 210, NC, 27516, Chapel Hill, USA.
Thomas van den AkkerAthena Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lenka BeňováDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Thérèse DelvauxDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Eliya M ZuluAfrican Institute for Development Policy, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ilene S SpeizerCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 123 West Franklin Street, Suite 210, NC, 27516, Chapel Hill, USA.

Funding

Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation INV-009814NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany factors influence young women's choice of contraceptive methods and where to source them, yet less is known about whether one of these choices (method or source) is prioritized and the relationship between these choices. This study qualitatively explored decision-making around contraceptive method and source choice among young women in Kenya.

methodsIn August-September 2019, 30 in-depth interviews were conducted with women ages 18-24 who had used two or more contraceptive methods and resided in three counties: Nairobi, Mombasa or Migori. Participants were recruited from public and private health facilities and pharmacies. Interview guides captured information about decision-making processes for each contraceptive method the respondent had ever used. Responses were audio-recorded, transcribed, translated into English, coded, and analyzed thematically.

resultsThe majority of respondents knew which method they wanted to use prior to seeking it from a source. This was true for all types of methods that women ever used. Of the small number of respondents who selected their source first, most were in the post-partum period or experiencing side effects and sought counseling at a source before choosing a method.

conclusionsThis study highlights the importance of providing young women with high quality counseling that provides full information about contraceptive options and addresses that young women's needs vary along the reproductive health continuum of care. This will ensure that young women have information to inform future contraceptive decision-making prior to seeking care.

Indexed as

Contraception BehaviorFamily Planning ServicesContraceptionContraceptive AgentsFemaleHumansKenyaQualitative ResearchContraceptive AgentsFamily planningMethod choiceMethod sourceService delivery pointYouth

Identifiers

PMID37365630
PMCPMC10294346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.