Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37365562›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2023

Systematic review: interventions to quit tobacco products for young adults.

Eunhee Park, Yanjun Zhou, Chiahui Chen, Thomas Chacko, Martin Mahoney, Yu-Ping Chang

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eunhee ParkUniversity at Buffalo, School of Nursing, 3435 Main St, 14214-8013, Buffalo, NY, US. eunheepa@buffalo.edu.
Yanjun ZhouUniversity at Buffalo, School of Nursing, 3435 Main St, 14214-8013, Buffalo, NY, US.
Chiahui ChenUniversity at Buffalo, School of Nursing, 3435 Main St, 14214-8013, Buffalo, NY, US.
Thomas ChackoUniversity at Buffalo, School of Nursing, 3435 Main St, 14214-8013, Buffalo, NY, US.
Martin MahoneyRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY, 14263, US.
Yu-Ping ChangUniversity at Buffalo, School of Nursing, 3435 Main St, 14214-8013, Buffalo, NY, US.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

University of Buffalo Clinical and Translational Science Institute - Supplement SchulyerUL1TR001412 · NCATS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MURPHY, TIMOTHY F · 2015 to 2024
$33.8M
UB Clinical Scholar Program in Implementation Science to Achieve Triple AimsK12HL138052 · NHLBI · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI CANTY, JOHN M, SINGH, RANJIT · 2017 to 2021
$3.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001412NHLBI NIH HHS HL138052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYoung adulthood is an important period for smoking cessation; however, there is limited evidence of smoking-cessation interventions for young adults. The aims of this study were to identify evidence-based smoking-cessation strategies for young adults, examine gaps in the literature regarding smoking cessation among young adults, and discuss methodological issues/challenges related to smoking-cessation studies for young adults.

methodsStudies tested interventions for smoking cessation among young adults (18 to 26 years old), excluding pilot studies. Five main search engines were used, including PubMed, the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. The search was conducted for articles published from January 2009 to December 2019. Intervention characteristics and cessation outcomes were reviewed, and methodological quality was evaluated.

resultsA total of 14 articles met inclusion criteria, including randomized controlled studies and repeated cross-sectional studies. Interventions included the following: text messaging (4/14, 28.6%), social media use (2/14, 14.3%), web-or app-based intervention (2/14, 14.3%), telephone counseling (1/14, 7.1%), in-person counseling (3/14, 21.4%), pharmacological (1/14, 7.1%), and self-help booklet (1/14, 7.1%). The intervention duration and frequency of contact with participants differed and yielded varied outcomes.

conclusionsMultiple interventions have been examined to aid young adults in achieving smoking cessation. While several approaches seem promising, at the present time, the published literature is inconclusive about the type of intervention that is most effective for young adults. Future studies should compare the relative effectiveness of these intervention modalities.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationTobacco ProductsAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHealth BehaviorHumansYoung AdultSmoking cessationSystematic reviewYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID37365562
PMCPMC10294369
OpenAlexW4382139383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.