Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37365479›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Assessing the Phagosome Proteome by Quantitative Mass Spectrometry.

Maria Emilia Dueñas, José Luis Marín-Rubio, Julien Peltier-Heap, Anetta Hartlova, Matthias Trost

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Emilia Dueñas *Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
José Luis Marín-Rubio *Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Julien Peltier-HeapInoviv, London, UK.
Anetta HartlovaInstitute of Biomedicine, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, the Sahlgrenska Academy/Faculty of Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Matthias TrostBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. matthias.trost@ncl.ac.uk.
Newcastle University · GBNewcastle College · GBUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

Wellcome Trust 215542/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of phagocytosis involves a series of defined steps, including the formation of a new intracellular organelle, i.e., the phagosome, and the maturation of the phagosome by fusion with endosomes and lysosomes to produce an acidic and proteolytic environment in which the pathogens are degraded. Phagosome maturation is associated with significant changes in the proteome of phagosomes due to the acquisition of new proteins or enzymes, post-translational modifications of existing proteins, as well as other biochemical changes that ultimately lead to the degradation or processing of the phagocytosed particle. Phagosomes are highly dynamic organelles formed by the uptake of particles through phagocytic innate immune cells; thus characterization of the phagosomal proteome is essential to understand the mechanisms controlling innate immunity, as well as vesicle trafficking. In this chapter, we describe how novel quantitative proteomics methods, such as using tandem mass tag (TMT) labelling or acquiring label-free data using data-independent acquisition (DIA), can be applied for the characterization of protein composition of phagosomes in macrophages.

Indexed as

PhagosomesProteomeMacrophagesMass SpectrometryPhagocytosisProteomeData-dependent acquisition (DDA)Data-independent acquisition (DIA)MacrophagesMass spectrometry (MS)PhagosomesQuantitative proteomicsTandem mass tag (TMT)

Identifiers

PMID37365479
OpenAlexW4382120342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.