ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023
Impact of AI system on recognition for anatomical landmarks related to reducing bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence augmented tutoring vs expert instruction on learning simulated general surgical skills: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic review on the use of artificial intelligence to identify anatomical structures during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a tool towards the future.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Automated Recognition of Hepatocystic Anatomy During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Current Evidence, Clinical Readiness, and Future Directions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Impact of artificial intelligence intervention on awareness of anatomical landmarks in laparoscopic gastrectomy: An exploratory study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Deep-learning segmentation to guide bladder neck recognition in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.BJU international · 2026Article
- An artificial intelligence-based navigation system for enhancing anatomical recognition and safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Surgeons' perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) for gaze guidance in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Educational Impact of Artificial Intelligence-Navigation Surgery on Anatomical Landmark Recognition in Medical Students.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in emergency surgery: a scoping review within the artificial intelligence in emergency and trauma surgery (ARIES) project.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2026Article
- Real-time multicenter semantic segmentation for laparoscopic gastrectomy: development, external validation and operating room deployment of an AI navigation system.Military Medical Research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted scar visualization under intraoperative bleeding using CycleGAN and uncertainty fusion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Patient outcomes and healthcare costs following iatrogenic bile duct injuries: A national multicentre retrospective cohort study.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of Its Role in Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Use of artificial intelligence in the analysis of digital videos of invasive surgical procedures: scoping review.BJS open · 2025Article
- Development of an artificial intelligence system to indicate intraoperative findings of scarring in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystitis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Vision techniques for anatomical structures in laparoscopic surgery: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- Enhancing surgical object detection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy with explicit positional relationship modeling.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Patient and hospital factors influence surgical approach in treatment of acute cholecystitis.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Observational
- Artificial intelligence assisted operative anatomy recognition in endoscopic pituitary surgery.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence for surgical safety during laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Indication of anatomical landmarks related to postoperative pancreatic fistula using deep learning.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccording to the National Clinical Database of Japan, the incidence of bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy has hovered around 0.4% for the last 10 years and has not declined. On the other hand, it has been found that about 60% of BDI occurrences are due to misidentifying anatomical landmarks. However, the authors developed an artificial intelligence (AI) system that gave intraoperative data to recognize the extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD), cystic duct (CD), inferior border of liver S4 (S4), and Rouviere sulcus (RS). The purpose of this research was to evaluate how the AI system affects landmark identification.
methodsWe prepared a 20-s intraoperative video before the serosal incision of Calot's triangle dissection and created a short video with landmarks overwritten by AI. The landmarks were defined as landmark (LM)-EHBD, LM-CD, LM-RS, and LM-S4. Four beginners and four experts were recruited as subjects. After viewing a 20-s intraoperative video, subjects annotated the LM-EHBD and LM-CD. Then, a short video is shown with the AI overwriting landmark instructions; if there is a change in each perspective, the annotation is changed. The subjects answered a three-point scale questionnaire to clarify whether the AI teaching data advanced their confidence in verifying the LM-RS and LM-S4. Four external evaluation committee members investigated the clinical importance.
resultsIn 43 of 160 (26.9%) images, the subjects transformed their annotations. Annotation changes were primarily observed in the gallbladder line of the LM-EHBD and LM-CD, and 70% of these shifts were considered safer changes. The AI-based teaching data encouraged both beginners and experts to affirm the LM-RS and LM-S4.
conclusionThe AI system provided significant awareness to beginners and experts and prompted them to identify anatomical landmarks linked to reducing BDI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.