Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37365387›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2024

Sexual satisfaction in prostate cancer: a multi-group comparison study of treated patients, patients under active surveillance, patients with negative biopsy, and controls.

Lauren M Walker, Pablo Santos-Iglesias

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren M WalkerDepartment of Oncology and Psychology, University of Calgary. Tom Baker Cancer Centre - Holy Cross Site, Psychosocial Resources, 2202 - 2nd St SW, Calgary, AB, T2S 3C1, Canada. lauren.walker@albertahealthservices.ca.
Pablo Santos-IglesiasDepartment of Psychology, Cape Breton University, Sydney, Canada.
Cape Breton University · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

Rising Star independent investigator grant from Movember and Prostate Cancer Canada (now the Canadian Cancer Society) Grant # RS2015-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeErectile function changes after prostate cancer (PCa) treatment are well documented, but less understood is the relative impact of prostate biopsy and active surveillance on sexual well-being. It is unknown whether potential negative impacts are exclusive to patients who have been treated for PCa, or whether the diagnosis itself or the experience of biopsy may also impact sexual well-being. Sexual satisfaction is an important yet understudied indicator of sexual well-being in this population. This study examines sexual satisfaction and its predictors across several comparison groups to explore relative impact.

methodsAt baseline and 12 months, questionnaire data was collected in four samples: (1) following PCa treatment, (2) active surveillance, (3) negative prostate biopsy result, and (4) controls receiving no biopsy or treatment. Predictors assessed included group, erectile function, communication style, and partner involvement.

resultsSexual satisfaction declined in the active treatment group, no changes were observed in active surveillance or non-PCa control, and improvements were observed in the biopsy group. Predictors of sexual satisfaction over and above erectile function included restrictive communication (i.e. protective buffering) and perceived partner involvement. For higher levels of erectile function, a higher perceived degree of partner involvement was protective of sexual satisfaction.

conclusionSexual satisfaction is an important indicator of sexual well-being and is negatively impacted following PCa treatment, but not active surveillance or prostate biopsy. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Communication and partner involvement are potentially modifiable factors to be considered for intervention and may promote sexual satisfaction following PCa treatment. Patients experiencing negative biopsy, who note lower sexual satisfaction may experience improved satisfaction with time, and those under active surveillance who worry about sexual satisfaction may find reassurance from these results.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsAgedBiopsyCase-Control StudiesErectile DysfunctionHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgasmPersonal SatisfactionQuality of LifeSexual BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesWatchful WaitingCouples communicationErectile functionPartner involvementProstate biopsyProstate cancerProtective bufferingSexual satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID37365387
OpenAlexW4382046800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.