Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37365381›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2023

Pattern of care for re-irradiation in locally recurrent rectal cancer: a national survey on behalf of the AIRO gastrointestinal tumors study group.

Giovanna Mantello, Elena Galofaro, Luciana Caravatta, Clelia Di Carlo, Sabrina Montrone, Donatella Arpa, Giuditta Chiloiro, Antonino De Paoli, Vittorio Donato, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Outcome of intraoperative brachytherapy as a salvage treatment for locally recurrent rectal cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 15 institutions in 2 countries.

Giovanna MantelloRadiotherapy Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126, Ancona, Italy.
Elena GalofaroRadiotherapy Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126, Ancona, Italy. elena.galofaro@ospedaliriuniti.marche.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1105-4533
Luciana CaravattaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, SS Annunziata Hospital, Chieti, Italy.
Clelia Di CarloRadiotherapy Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126, Ancona, Italy.
Sabrina MontroneDepartment of Radiotherapy, Pisa University, Pisa, Italy.
Donatella ArpaIRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Radiotherapy Unit, Meldola, Italy.
Giuditta ChiloiroDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Antonino De PaoliDivision of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
Vittorio DonatoRadiation Oncology Division, Oncology and Speciality Medicine Department, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Maria Antonietta GambacortaDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Domenico GenovesiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, SS Annunziata Hospital, Chieti, Italy.
Marco LupattelliRadiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Gabriella MacchiaRadiotherapy Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Campobasso, Italy.
Giampaolo MontesiRadiotherapy Unit, ULSS5, Rovigo, Italy.
Rita Marina NiespoloRadiotherapy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo, Monza, Italy.
Elisa PalazzariDivision of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
Antonio PontorieroRadiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Melissa ScriccioloUOC di Radioterapia Oncologica Mestre, Ospedale dell'Angelo, Venice, Mestre, Italy.
Francesca ValvoFondazione CNAO, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy.
Pierfrancesco FrancoDepartment of Translational Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Maggiore Della Carità University Hospital, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Marche Polytechnic University · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITCentro di Riferimento Oncologico · ITOspedale SS. Annunziata · ITAULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana · ITAzienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITCarlo Forlanini Hospital · ITIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · ITNational Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy · ITOspedale dell' Angelo · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Perugia · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRadical resection (R0) represents the best curative treatment for local recurrence (LR) rectal cancer. Re-irradiation (re-RT) can increase the rate of R0 resection. Currently, there is a lack of guidelines on Re-RT for LR rectal cancer. The Italian Association of Radiation and clinical oncology for gastrointestinal tumors (AIRO-GI) study group released a national survey to investigate the current clinical practice of external beam radiation therapy in these patients. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn February 2021, the survey was designed and distributed to members of the GI working group. The questionnaire consisted of 40 questions regarding center characteristics, clinical indications, doses, and treatment techniques of re-RT for LR rectal cancer.

resultsA total of 37 questionnaires were collected. Re-RT was reported as an option for neoadjuvant treatment in resectable and unresectable disease by 55% and 75% of respondents, respectively. Long-course treatment with 30-40 Gy (1.8-2 Gy/die, 1.2 Gy bid) and hypofractionated regimen of 30-35 Gy in 5 fractions were used in most centers. A total dose of 90-100 Gy as EqD2 dose (α/β = 5 Gy) was delivered by 46% of the respondents considering the previous treatment. Modern conformal techniques and daily image-guided radiation therapy protocols were used in 94% of centers.

conclusionOur survey showed that re-RT treatment is performed with advanced technology that allow a good management of LR rectal cancer. Significant variations were observed in terms of dose and fractionation, highlighting the need for a consensus on a common treatment strategy that could be validated in prospective studies.

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsRe-IrradiationHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesRectumAIRO gastrointestinal tumors study groupNational surveyRectal cancerRecurrenceRe-irradiation

Identifiers

PMID37365381
PMCPMC10317862
OpenAlexW4382139534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.