Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37365373›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2023

Technology-Enhanced Learning in the Education of Oncology Medical Professionals: A Systematic Literature Review.

Taibe Kulaksız, Jana Steinbacher, Marco Kalz

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring the Current Use of Educational Technologies in the Oncology Domain Across Europe: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. E-Learning Acceptance among Oncology Healthcare Professionals in Europe.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Taibe KulaksızInstitute for Arts, Music and Media, Heidelberg University of Education, Keplerstraße 87, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. taibekulaksiz@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7960-7440
Jana SteinbacherInstitute for Arts, Music and Media, Heidelberg University of Education, Keplerstraße 87, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9477-0415
Marco KalzInstitute for Arts, Music and Media, Heidelberg University of Education, Keplerstraße 87, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1471-5827

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As cancer continues to be a significant global health challenge, the education of oncology professionals plays a crucial role in providing quality cancer care and achieving optimal patient outcomes. In order to meet the growing need for flexible, accessible, and effective training, this study examines the role of technology-enhanced learning (TEL) in the education of oncology medical professionals. Following the PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review included 34 articles published between 2012 and 2022 in EBSCO and PubMed databases. Findings reveal a diverse range of digital tools being used in oncology training, despite a shortage of advanced educational technologies and limited functional improvement compared to traditional instruction. Since the training primarily targeted at multiple professions in the medical expert role, with radiation oncologists being overrepresented, other oncology domains should be examined more thoroughly in the future, taking into account distinct professional abilities, e.g. communication, collaboration, and leadership skills with reference to the CanMEDS framework. Although the training programmes generally resulted in positive outcomes according to the Kirkpatrick evaluation model, experimental research designs were rather limited. Therefore, the substantial contribution and limitations of TEL in oncology education need to be clarified. Precise reporting of digital tools and instructional processes, as well as challenges encountered, is highly recommended to increase transparency and replicability. Research methodology in digital oncology education remains a major concern and should be addressed accordingly in future research.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionHealth PersonnelHumansLearningTechnologyCancer care professionalsCancer educationDigital educationOncology educationSystematic reviewTechnology-enhanced learning

Identifiers

PMID37365373
PMCPMC10509048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.