Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37365353›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2024

[Geriatric assessment in dentistry : A review of chewing function tests].

Maximiliane Amelie Schlenz, Alexander Schmidt, Clara Sophie Gäbler, Gerald Kolb, Bernd Wöstmann

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maximiliane Amelie SchlenzZentrum für ZMK-Heilkunde - Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392, Gießen, Deutschland. maximiliane.a.schlenz@dentist.med.uni-giessen.de.
Alexander SchmidtZentrum für ZMK-Heilkunde - Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392, Gießen, Deutschland. alexander.schmidt@dentist.med.uni-giessen.de.
Clara Sophie GäblerZentrum für ZMK-Heilkunde - Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392, Gießen, Deutschland.
Gerald KolbAmbulanz für Physikalische und Rehabilitative Medizin, Spezialisierte Geriatrische Diagnostik und Therapie, "Ärztehaus" am Bonifatius Hospital Lingen, Lingen, Deutschland.
Bernd WöstmannZentrum für ZMK-Heilkunde - Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392, Gießen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to increasing life expectancy and the associated demographic changes, more and more people are dependent on care. To identify a possible need for dental treatment, chewing function tests as assessment instruments have proven their effectiveness. In this article, the reader is given an overview of existing chewing function tests and their implementation. It is important that a patient with pain should be presented to a dentist immediately, regardless of whether a chewing function test is performed. Furthermore, chewing function tests are not a substitute for routine dental examinations, but they could provide information to (dental) laypersons as to whether an appointment should be arranged in a dental practice or whether a dental consultation is necessary.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentMasticationAgedAged, 80 and overDental Care for AgedFemaleHumansMaleGeriatric dentistryGeriatric oral healthMasticationOral health care servicesPatient care

Identifiers

PMID37365353
PMCPMC11208189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.