Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37365345›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2023

Left anterior supramarginal gyrus activity during tool use action observation after extensive tool use training.

Taylor J Bosch, Kelene A Fercho, Reuven Hanna, Jamie L Scholl, Austin Rallis, Lee A Baugh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Object-directed action representations are componentially built in parietal cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Taylor J BoschDivision of Basic Biomedical Sciences, Basic Biomedical Sciences & Center for Brain and Behavior Research, University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, 414 E. Clark St., Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA.
Kelene A FerchoFAA Civil Aerospace Med. Inst., Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Reuven HannaDivision of Basic Biomedical Sciences, Basic Biomedical Sciences & Center for Brain and Behavior Research, University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, 414 E. Clark St., Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA.
Jamie L SchollDivision of Basic Biomedical Sciences, Basic Biomedical Sciences & Center for Brain and Behavior Research, University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, 414 E. Clark St., Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA.
Austin RallisDivision of Basic Biomedical Sciences, Basic Biomedical Sciences & Center for Brain and Behavior Research, University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, 414 E. Clark St., Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA.
Lee A BaughDivision of Basic Biomedical Sciences, Basic Biomedical Sciences & Center for Brain and Behavior Research, University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, 414 E. Clark St., Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA. lee.baugh@usd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6227-497X
University of South Dakota · USCivil Aerospace Medical Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advanced use of complex tools is considered a primary characteristic of human evolution and technological advancement. However, questions remain regarding whether humans possess unique underlying brain networks that support advanced tool-using abilities. Specifically, previous studies have demonstrated the presence of a structurally and functionally unique region in the left anterior supramarginal gyrus (aSMG), that is consistently active during tool use action observation. This region has been proposed as a primary hub for integrating semantic and technical information to form action plans with tools. However, it is still largely unknown how tool use motor learning affects left aSMG activation or connectivity with other brain regions. To address this, participants with little experience using chopsticks observed an experimenter using chopsticks to perform a novel task while undergoing two functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans. Between the scans, participants underwent four weeks of behavioral training where they learned to use chopsticks and achieve proficiency in the observed task. Results demonstrated a significant change in effective connectivity between the left aSMG and the left anterior intraparietal sulcus (aIPS), a region involved in object affordances and planning grasping actions. These findings suggest that during unfamiliar tool use, the left aSMG integrates semantic and technical information to communicate with regions involved with grasp selection, such as the aIPS. This communication then allows appropriate grasps to be planned based on the physical properties of the objects involved and their potential interactions.

Indexed as

Brain MappingTool Use BehaviorBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingParietal LobePsychomotor PerformanceAction observationfMRISensorimotor controlSupramarginal gyrusTechnical reasoningTool use

Identifiers

PMID37365345
OpenAlexW4382048168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.