Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37365273›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2023

Gene regulatory network inference in the era of single-cell multi-omics.

Pau Badia-I-Mompel, Lorna Wessels, Sophia Müller-Dott, Rémi Trimbour, Ricardo O Ramirez Flores, Ricard Argelaguet, Julio Saez-Rodriguez

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 269 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
269citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
61.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

269 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 401 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Inferring Gene Regulatory Networks in Stem Cells: Methods and Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Causal graph neural networks for healthcare.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Decoding Spatial Heterogeneity and Multi-Omics Regulation with Hierarchical Graph Learning.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

209 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pau Badia-I-MompelHeidelberg University, Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Bioquant, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1004-3923
Lorna WesselsHeidelberg University, Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Bioquant, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0004-4198-7654
Sophia Müller-DottHeidelberg University, Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Bioquant, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9710-1865
Rémi TrimbourHeidelberg University, Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Bioquant, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8770-8412
Ricardo O Ramirez FloresHeidelberg University, Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Bioquant, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0087-371X
Ricard ArgelaguetAltos Labs, Granta Park, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3199-3722
Julio Saez-RodriguezHeidelberg University, Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Bioquant, Heidelberg, Germany. pub.saez@uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8552-8976
Heidelberg University · DECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interplay between chromatin, transcription factors and genes generates complex regulatory circuits that can be represented as gene regulatory networks (GRNs). The study of GRNs is useful to understand how cellular identity is established, maintained and disrupted in disease. GRNs can be inferred from experimental data - historically, bulk omics data - and/or from the literature. The advent of single-cell multi-omics technologies has led to the development of novel computational methods that leverage genomic, transcriptomic and chromatin accessibility information to infer GRNs at an unprecedented resolution. Here, we review the key principles of inferring GRNs that encompass transcription factor-gene interactions from transcriptomics and chromatin accessibility data. We focus on the comparison and classification of methods that use single-cell multimodal data. We highlight challenges in GRN inference, in particular with respect to benchmarking, and potential further developments using additional data modalities.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksGenomicsSingle-Cell AnalysisAnimalsChromatinGene Expression ProfilingHumansMultiomicsTranscription FactorsTranscriptomeChromatinTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID37365273
OpenAlexW4382022265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.