Observational studyScientific reports2023
Serum caffeine concentrations in preterm infants: a retrospective study.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Association Between Serum Caffeine Concentrations, Intermittent Hypoxia and Apnea in Preterm Infants: A Prospective Observational Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Developmental age and clinical illness driveFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Methylxanthines: The Major Impact of Caffeine in Clinical Practice in Patients Diagnosed with Apnea of Prematurity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The Use of Caffeine Citrate in the Management of Neonatal Apnea in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Rapid Systematic Review.Health science reports · 2025Review
- Article
- Development of Personalised Immediate-Release Gel-Based Formulations Using Semi-Solid Extrusion.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Babyccino: The Role of Caffeine in the Prevention of Acute Kidney Injury in Neonates-A Literature Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Therapeutic drug monitoring is generally unnecessary in caffeine treatment for apnea of prematurity, as serum caffeine concentrations in preterm infants are normally markedly lower than those at which caffeine intoxication occurs. However, several studies have reported preterm infants having developed toxicity. This retrospective observational study, conducted at a tertiary center in Kagawa, Japan, aimed to evaluate the correlation between the maintenance dose and serum caffeine concentrations and determine the maintenance dose leading to suggested toxic caffeine levels. We included 24 preterm infants (gestational age, 27 ± 2.9 weeks; body weight, 991 ± 297 g) who were treated with caffeine citrate for apnea of prematurity between 2018 and 2021, and 272 samples were analyzed. Our primary outcome measure was the maintenance dose leading to suggested toxic caffeine levels. We found a positive correlation between caffeine dose and serum caffeine concentrations (p < 0.05, r = 0.72). At doses of ≥ 8 mg/kg/day, 15% (16/109) of patients had serum caffeine concentrations above the suggested toxic levels. Patients who receive doses ≥ 8 mg/kg/day risk reaching the suggested toxic serum caffeine levels. It remains unclear whether suggested toxic caffeine concentrations are detrimental to neurological prognosis. Further investigation is required to understand the clinical effects/outcomes of high serum levels of caffeine and to obtain long-term neurodevelopmental follow-up data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.