Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37365210›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Utilizing a tablet-based artificial intelligence system to assess movement disorders in a prospective study.

Maximilian Purk, Michael Fujarski, Marlon Becker, Tobias Warnecke, Julian Varghese

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03638479 (Utilizing Smart Devices to Identify New Phenotypical Characteristics in Movement Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03638479 completednot on this map

Utilizing Smart Devices to Identify New Phenotypical Characteristics in Movement Disorders

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversität MünsterRan2019 to 2021Enrolled513ConditionsParkinson Disease, Essential Tremor, Movement Disorders, Parkinson's SyndromeArmsData Capture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maximilian PurkInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Michael FujarskiInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany. Michael.Fujarski@uni-muenster.de.
Marlon BeckerInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Tobias WarneckeDepartment of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, Klinikum Osnabrück-Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Münster, Osnabrück, Germany.
Julian VargheseInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spiral drawings on paper are used as routine measures in hospitals to assess Parkinson's Disease motor deficiencies. In the age of emerging mobile health tools and Artificial Intelligence a comprehensive digital setup enables granular biomarker analyses and improved differential diagnoses in movement disorders. This study aims to evaluate on discriminatory features among Parkison's Disease patients, healthy subjects and diverse movement disorders. Overall, 24 Parkinson's Disease patients, 27 healthy controls and 26 patients with similar differential diagnoses were assessed with a novel tablet-based system. It utilizes an integrative assessment by combining a structured symptoms questionnaire-the Parkinson's Disease Non-Motor Scale-and 2-handed spiral drawing captured on a tablet device. Three different classification tasks were evaluated: Parkinson's Disease patients versus healthy control group (Task 1), all Movement disorders versus healthy control group (Task 2) and Parkinson's Disease patients versus diverse other movement disorder patients (Task 3). To systematically study feature importances of digital biomarkers a Machine Learning classifier is cross-validated and interpreted with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. The number of non-motor symptoms differed significantly for Tasks 1 and 2 but not for Task 3. The proposed drawing features partially differed significantly for all three tasks. The diagnostic accuracy was on average 94.0% in Task 1, 89.4% in Task 2, and 72% in Task 3. While the accuracy in Task 3 only using the symptom questionnaire was close to the baseline, it greatly improved when including the tablet-based features from 60 to 72%. The accuracies for all three tasks were significantly improved by integrating the two modalities. These results show that tablet-based drawing features can not only be captured by consumer grade devices, but also capture specific features to Parkinson's Disease that significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy compared to the symptom questionnaire. Therefore, the proposed system provides an objective type of disease characterization of movement disorders, which could be utilized for home-based assessments as well.Clinicaltrials.gov Study-ID: NCT03638479.

Indexed as

Parkinson DiseaseArtificial IntelligenceHandHumansMovementProspective StudiesUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID37365210
PMCPMC10293248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.