Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37364938›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2023

Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Spine Care.

Robin R Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Robin R YoungPublisher and Editor, RRY Publications, Founder and CEO, PearDiver Technologies, Beaverton, OR, USA robin@ryortho.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pace of US Food and Drug Administration-approved medical devices that incorporate artificial intelligence (AI) or machine learning as part of the device is accelerating. As of September 2021, 350 such devices have been approved for commercial sale in the United States. As much as AI has become ubiquitous in our lives-keeping our cars between the lines on the highway, converting speech to text on the fly, recommending movies, books, or restaurants, and so much more, AI also appears destined to become a routine aspect in daily spine surgery. Neural network types of AI programs have achieved extraordinary pattern recognition and predictive abilities-far surpassing human capabilities-and thus appears well suited to back pain and spine surgery diagnostic and treatment pattern recognition and prediction tasks. These AI programs are also data hungry. As luck would have it, surgery generates an estimated 80 MB per patient per day collected in a variety of datasets. When aggregated, this represents a 200+ billion patient record data ocean of diagnostic and treatment patterns. Such Big Data, when combined with a new generation of convolutional neural network (CNN) AI, set the stage for a cognitive revolution in spine surgery. However, there are important issues and concerns. Spine surgery is a mission-critical task. Because AI programs lack explainability and are absolutely reliant on correlative, not causative, data relationships, the emerging role of AI and Big Data in spine surgery will likely come first in productivity tools and later in narrowly defined spine surgery tasks. The purpose of this article is to review the emergence of AI in spine surgery applications and examine spine surgery heuristics and "expert" decision models within the context of AI and Big Data.

Indexed as

approved AI/ML devicesArtificial intelligencebig dataFDA AI/ML guidelinesmachine learningspine surgery heuristics

Identifiers

PMID37364938
PMCPMC10318907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.