Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37364429›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2023

Achieving the promise and avoiding the peril of chemical probes using genetics.

Natalie H Jones, Tarun M Kapoor

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natalie H JonesLaboratory of Chemistry and Cell Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA; Tri-Institutional PhD Program in Chemical Biology, New York, NY, USA.
Tarun M KapoorLaboratory of Chemistry and Cell Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: kapoor@rockefeller.edu.
Rockefeller University · USTri-Institutional PhD Program in Chemical Biology · US

Funding

Chemical Biology of Cell Division - Revision - 2R35GM130234 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI TARUN M. KAPOOR · 2019 to 2026
$6.0M
Tri-Institutional PhD Program in Chemical BiologyT32GM115327 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI TAN, DEREK S · 2015 to 2019
$741k
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM130234NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM115327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical probes can be valuable tools for studying protein targets, but addressing concerns about a probe's cellular target or its specificity can be challenging. A reliable strategy is to use a mutation that does not alter a target's function but confers resistance (or sensitizes) to the inhibitor in both cellular and biochemical assays. However, challenges remain in finding such mutations. Here, we discuss structure- and cell-based approaches to identify resistance- and sensitivity-conferring mutations. Further, we describe how resistance-conferring mutations can help with compound design, and the use of saturation mutagenesis to characterize a compound binding site. We highlight how genetic approaches can ensure the proper use of chemical inhibitors to pursue mechanistic studies and test therapeutic hypotheses.

Indexed as

MutationMutagenesis

Identifiers

PMID37364429
PMCPMC10561518
OpenAlexW4381997021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.