ReviewPEC innovation2022
Parents' self-reported experiences and information needs related to acute pediatric asthma exacerbations: A mixed studies systematic review.
Review in PEC innovation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Psychosocial Aspects of Caregiving That Influence Stress and Burden Among Parents of Children With Type 1 Diabetes.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Understanding how personalized pediatric asthma information and support addresses rural families' unmet needs.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026Article
- Parental Self-Efficacy in Managing Pediatrics' Medications and Treatments in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Seeking Care for Children with Intellectual and/or Developmental Disabilities in the Emergency Department: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review of Parents' Experiences and Information Needs.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2024Review
- Challenges in the Pharmacotherapeutic Management of Pediatric Asthma.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Children at risk of anaphylaxis: A mixed-studies systematic review of parents' experiences and information needs.PEC innovation · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To systematically review the scientific literature examining parents' experiences and information needs for the management of their child's asthma exacerbations. Methods: We searched five databases for quantitative and qualitative studies in Canada and the United States from 2002 onwards. A convergent integrated approach and the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool were used to analyze and appraise the evidence, respectively. Results: We included 84 studies (27 quantitative, 54 qualitative, 3 mixed methods). Some parents lacked confidence in recognizing or managing exacerbations. A few parents were uncertain when and where to seek medical help. The main barrier to accessing care was cost. Impacts on parents included poor sleep, distress, and lifestyle disruptions. Parents felt they lacked information and wanted education on treatments and how to recognize and manage exacerbations via education sessions, written materials, community outreach and online resources. Conclusion: Improved education for parents may help reduce parents' stress, asthma-related morbidities for children and use of urgent health services. Innovation: The development of tailored interventions and knowledge translation strategies with input from target audiences (e.g. parents, health care providers) is necessary to meet their information needs and support adherence to clinical recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.