Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37363950›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2023

Acoustofluidic Properties of Polystyrene Microparticles.

Alexander Edthofer, Jakub Novotny, Andreas Lenshof, Thomas Laurell, Thierry Baasch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexander EdthoferDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lund University, 223 63 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0001-0252-3775
Jakub NovotnyDepartment of Bioanalytical Instrumentation, Institute of Analytical Chemistry of the CAS, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1514-0439
Andreas LenshofDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lund University, 223 63 Lund, Sweden.
Thomas LaurellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lund University, 223 63 Lund, Sweden.
Thierry BaaschDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lund University, 223 63 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2311-9069

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acoustophoresis has become a powerful tool to separate microparticles and cells, based on their material and biophysical properties, and is gaining popularity in clinical and biomedical research. One major application of acoustophoresis is to measure the compressibility of cells and small organisms, which is related to their contents. The cell compressibility can be extracted from the acoustic mobility, which is the main output of acoustic migration experiments, if the material properties and sizes of reference particles, the size of the cells, and the surrounding medium are known. Accurate methods to measure and calibrate the acoustic energy density in acoustophoresis systems are therefore critical. In this Perspective, polystyrene microparticles have become the most commonly used reference particles in acoustophoresis, due to their similar biophysical properties to cells. We utilized a two-step focusing method to measure the relative acoustic mobility of polystyrene beads of various sizes and colors and present a quantitative analysis of the variation in acousto-mechanical properties of polystyrene microparticles, showing a large spread in their material properties. A variation of more than 25% between different particle types was found. Thus, care is required when relying on polystyrene particles as a reference when characterizing acoustofluidics systems or acousto-mechanical properties of cells.

Indexed as

Cell-Derived MicroparticlesMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesAcousticsParticle SizePolystyrenesPolystyrenes

Identifiers

PMID37363950
PMCPMC10339281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.