Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37363851›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2023

Hypothesis Scoring for Confidence-Aware Blood Pressure Estimation With Particle Filters.

Jonathan Martinez, Bryant Passage, Bobak J Mortazavi, Roozbeh Jafari

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan Martinez
Bryant Passage
Bobak J Mortazavi
Roozbeh Jafari
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

An Unobtrusive Continuous Cuff-less Blood Pressure Monitor for Nocturnal HypertensionR01HL151240 · NHLBI · TEXAS ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION · PI JAFARI, ROOZBEH · 2020 to 2024
$3.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL151240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose our Confidence-Aware Particle Filter (CAPF) framework that analyzes a series of estimated changes in blood pressure (BP) to provide several true state hypotheses for a given instance. Particularly, our novel confidence-awareness mechanism assigns likelihood scores to each hypothesis in an effort to discard potentially erroneous measurements - based on the agreement amongst a series of estimated changes and the physiological plausibility when considering DBP/SBP pairs. The particle filter formulation (or sequential Monte Carlo method) can jointly consider the hypotheses and their probabilities over time to provide a stable trend of estimated BP measurements. In this study, we evaluate BP trend estimation from an emerging bio-impedance (Bio-Z) prototype wearable modality although it is applicable to all types of physiological modalities. Each subject in the evaluation cohort underwent a hand-gripper exercise, a cold pressor test, and a recovery state to increase the variation to the captured BP ranges. Experiments show that CAPF yields superior continuous pulse pressure (PP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and systolic blood pressure (SBP) estimation performance compared to ten baseline approaches. Furthermore, CAPF performs on track to comply with AAMI and BHS standards for achieving a performance classification of Grade A, with mean error accuracies of -0.16 ± 3.75 mmHg for PP (r = 0.81), 0.42 ± 4.39 mmHg for DBP (r = 0.92), and -0.09 ± 6.51 mmHg for SBP (r = 0.92) from more than test 3500 data points.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure DeterminationHypertensionBlood PressureHumans

Identifiers

PMID37363851
PMCPMC10567135
OpenAlexW4382119113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.