Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37363804›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational social science2023

Geo-sentiment trends analysis of tweets in context of economy and employment during COVID-19.

Narendranath Sukhavasi, Janardan Misra, Vikrant Kaulgud, Sanjay Podder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational social science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Narendranath SukhavasiAccenture, Bangalore, India.
Janardan MisraAccenture, Bangalore, India.
Vikrant KaulgudAccenture, Bangalore, India.
Sanjay PodderAccenture, Bangalore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To effectively design policies and implement measures for addressing problems faced by people during these difficult times of pandemic, it is critical to have a clear vision of the problems people are freely talking about. One of the ways is to analyze social media feeds e.g., tweets, which has become one of the primary ways people express their views on various socioeconomic issues and on-ground effectiveness of measures adopted to address these issues. In this work, we attempt to uncover various socioeconomic issues, which are giving rise to negative and positive sentiments and their trends across geographies over a course of one year of the pandemic. We also try identifying similarities and differences in opinions as they vary across gender as the time passes through the crisis. Many previous works have analyzed sentiments in context of vaccines, fatalities, and lockdowns; however, socioeconomic issues did not receive full attention. We found that sentiments of people with respect to economy are negative across geographies during starting of pandemic. Thereafter, gradually sentiments lift towards positive direction reflecting a sense of improvement in situation. Females appeared to have slightly different concerns and hopes in comparison to males and especially across globe people expressed positive sentiments during new year time. Finally, this work, together with many other similar works on social media analysis gives ground for wide scale adoption of geo-temporal sentiments trend analysis of social media as a tool for uncovering key concerns and effectiveness of measures.

Indexed as

Gender opinion analysisGeo-temporal trend miningSentiment analysisTweet analytics

Identifiers

PMID37363804
PMCPMC10035975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.