Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37363720›Full record

ArticleNew microbes and new infections2023

Knowledge of mpox and its determinants among the healthcare personnel in Arabic regions: A multi-country cross-sectional study.

Sarya Swed, Haidara Bohsas, Muhammad Mainuddin Patwary, Hidar Alibrahim, Amine Rakab, Abdulqadir J Nashwan, Wael Hafez, Noheir A I Hassan, Sheikh Shoib, Mohamed Elsayed and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in New microbes and new infections, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 17 institutions in 14 countries.

Sarya SwedFaculty of Medicine, Aleppo University, Aleppo, Syria.
Haidara BohsasFaculty of Medicine, Aleppo University, Aleppo, Syria.
Muhammad Mainuddin PatwaryEnvironment and Sustainability Research Initiative, Khulna, 9208, Bangladesh.
Hidar AlibrahimFaculty of Medicine, Aleppo University, Aleppo, Syria.
Amine RakabWeill Cornell Medical College, Doha, Qatar.
Abdulqadir J NashwanHamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Wael HafezNMC Royal Hospital, 16th Street, Khalifa City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Noheir A I HassanAswan University, Faculty of Medicine, Aswan, Egypt.
Sheikh ShoibJLNM Hospital, Rainawari, Srinagar, India.
Mohamed ElsayedDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy III, University of Ulm, Leimgrubenweg, 12-14, 89075, Ulm, Germany.
Bisher SawafDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Mhd Kutaiba AlbuniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Elias BattikhDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Gihan Mustafa Kamal MohamedDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Adel AlBozomDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Ebrahim ShaddadFaculty of Medicine Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen.
Sherihan FatheyDepartment of Health, Giza, Egypt.
Mila Nu Nu HtayDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Manipal University College Malaysia, Malaysia.
Sanjit SahResearch Scientist, Global Consortium for Public Health and Research, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, 442001, India.
Ivan Cherrez-OjedaUniversidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador; Respiralab Research Group, Guayaquil, Ecuador.
Aroop MohantyDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, India.
Bijaya Kumar PadhiDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Alfonso J Rodriguez-MoralesGrupo de Investigación Biomedicina, Faculty of Medicine, Fundacion Universitaria Autónoma de las Américas, Pereira, Risaralda, Colombia.
Aravind Gandhi PDepartment of Community Medicine, ESIC Medical College & Hospital, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad, India.
Ranjit SahTribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, 46000, Nepal.
Hamad Medical Corporation · QAUniversity of Aleppo · SYAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INAswan University · EGCarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DEDr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre · INESIC Hospital · INJawaharlal Nehru Medical College · INKhulna University · BDManipal University College Malaysia · MYPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INSana'a University · YEShaikh Khalifa Medical City · AEShri Maharaja Hari Singh Hospital · INUniversidad Científica del Sur · PEUniversidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo · ECWeill Cornell Medical College in Qatar · QA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & aim: The monkeypox virus (MPXV), an Orthopoxvirus family member, is the zoonotic agent that causes mpox (formerly known as monkeypox). The ongoing mpox pandemic has caused cases across continents involving 110 countries. This study aimed to assess mpox knowledge and its determinants among healthcare personnel. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from June 6 to June 25, 2022, among 17 Arab countries. The self-administered questionnaire consists of 53 questions assessing the knowledge about the monkeypox virus. Results: In total, 5874 medical students and clinical doctors from 17 Arab countries participated in this study. Only 13.8% (n = 812) of respondents have ever received information about mpox during their studies in medicine. The mean knowledge score was 13.84, and the median score was 15 (range 1-34). More than half (51.3%, n = 3012) have heard about mpox before. A low proportion of the participants had a good level of knowledge on mpox. Only 11.7% of respondents had correctly identified the natural host and the incubation period of mpox. More than half (58.9%) were aware of the signs and symptoms of mpox. Few respondents (28%) believed that mpox and smallpox have similar signs and symptoms. Specialist doctors had higher knowledge of mpox (AOR = 2.96, 95% CI = 2.24-3.92, p < 0.001) than other cadres. Conclusion: Mpox awareness among Arabic medical students and practitioners is low; hence immediate action in creating awareness among arab healthcare professionals is the need of the hour. This is crucial in the mpox early detection and prevention of its spread.

Indexed as

AwarenessCliniciansMedical studentsMiddle EastMonkeypox

Identifiers

PMID37363720
PMCPMC10251727
OpenAlexW4380148671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.